Warning: fopen(/home/virtual/epih/journal/upload/ip_log/ip_log_2023-04.txt): failed to open stream: Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83 Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84 Estimating the reproductive number and the outbreak size of COVID-19 in Korea
Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Epidemiol Health : Epidemiology and Health



Page Path
HOME > Epidemiol Health > Volume 42; 2020 > Article
Original Article
Estimating the reproductive number and the outbreak size of COVID-19 in Korea
Sunhwa Choiorcid, Moran Kiorcid
Epidemiol Health 2020;42:e2020011.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2020011
Published online: March 12, 2020
  • 3,234 Download
  • 130 Crossref
  • 148 Scopus

Department of Cancer Control and Population Health, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea

Correspondence: Moran Ki  Department of Cancer Control and Policy, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-ro, Ilsandonggu, Goyang 10408, Korea  E-mail: moranki@ncc.re.kr
• Received: March 9, 2020   • Accepted: March 12, 2020

©2020, Korean Society of Epidemiology

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    Since the first novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patient in Korea was diagnosed on January 20, 2020, 30 patients were diagnosed until February 17, 2020. However, 5,298 additional patients were confirmed until March 4, 2020. Therefore, our objective was to estimate the reproduction number (R) and evaluate the effectiveness of preventive measures.
    A COVID-19 transmission model (SEIHR) was established to suit the Korean outbreak. The number of daily confirmed cases in Daegu and North Gyeongsang Province (NGP), the main area of outbreak, was used. The first patient’ symptom onset date in the Daegu/NGP outbreak was assumed as January 22, 2020. The R according to the start date of the effect of preventive measures was estimated.
    The estimated R in Hubei Province, China, was 4.0281, whereas the estimated initial R in Korea was 0.555, but later in Daegu/NGP, the value was between 3.472 and 3.543. When the transmission period decreases from 4-day to 2-day, the outbreak ends early, but the peak of the epidemic increases, and the total number of patients does not change greatly. It was found that, if transmission rate decreases, the outbreak ends early, and the size of the peak and the total number of patients also decreases.
    To end the COVID-19 epidemic, efforts to reduce the spread of the virus, such as social distancing and wearing masks, are absolutely crucial with the participation of the public, along with the policy of reducing the transmission period by finding and isolating patients as quickly as possible through the efforts of the quarantine authorities.
At the end of December 2019, China reported a case of pneumonia with unknown cause. The disease was subsequently found to be caused by a novel coronavirus and the World Health Organization (WHO) had named the new disease novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). As of March 8, 2020, there are approximately 100,000 infected people worldwide and more than 7,000 cases have been confirmed in Korea [1,2].
Starting with the first confirmed case on January 20, 2020, thirty cases were confirmed in Korea over a period of about 30 days until February 17, 2020. In most cases, people were infected while abroad and then spread the infection domestically upon return, or the disease was spread domestically by these index patients. However, starting with patient #31 on February 18, 2020, there has been an unprecedented rapid and large-scale epidemic in Daegu and North Gyeongsang Province (NGP). In the process of tracking those who came in contact with patient #31 on February 18, 2020, it was found that patient 331 had visited the Shincheonji Church in Daegu and had attended the service in Daegu on February 9, 2020 and 16, 2020, suggesting the possibility of transmission to other attendees. On February 20, 2020, a complete inspection began on 1,000 people who attend the Shincheonji Daegu Church. In addition, upon discovering that patient #31 had also visited Cheongdo in NGP in early February, the investigation on the possibility of connection with Daenam Hospital in Cheongdo also began. Subsequently, Daegu and NGP saw a rapid increase in confirmed COVID-19 cases, leading to 5,298 additionally confirmed cases since the diagnosis of patient #31 over a period of 15 days until March 4, 2020. The quarantine authorities actively responded by raising the risk alert for infectious disease to the serious level on February 23, 2020. Therefore, it is necessary to estimate the scale of the epidemic by estimating the initial infection reproduction number (R) for COVID-19 in Korea as well as the Rs for Daegu and NGP, in order to provide information critical in determining current and future intervention policies.
To estimate the parameters for the mathematical model, the press releases from the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (KCDC) were analyzed and the cases confirmed between January 20, 2020 and March 4, 2020 were used [2]. For the total population of Daegu, NGP, and Korea, the 2019 data from National Statistics portal were used [3]. For the number of daily confirmed cases in China, the official reports from the Chinese government were used.
Mathematical model
The transmission model for COVID-19 infection is a deterministic SEIHR model. In this model, the population is divided into 5 groups including susceptible (S), exposed (E), symptomatic infectious (I), hospitalized (H), recovered or death (R) (Figure 1).
The following assumptions are made in this model:
(1) Births and natural deaths in the population are not taken into account; (2) Infections during latency and asymptomatic infections are not taken into account; (3) Patient cannot spread disease while in isolation treatment after confirmed diagnosis; and (4) Recovered patients do not get re-infected.
Those in the S group are infected via contact with those in the I group and move to the E group. The mathematical model of COVID-19 infection transmission is expressed as follows. The total population (N) is equal to the sum of the populations in each group. Here, the change in the population of each group over time is as shown in the equation below (Equation 1).
Model constant β indicates the rate of infection transmission; and those who are exposed show symptoms after a certain period of time, turning into infectious patients who can transmit the disease. The constant κ refers to the progression of symptoms of COVID-19 while 1/κ refers to the mean latency period of COVID-19. Infected patients who express symptoms are confirmed positive after a certain period of time and are isolated. The rate of confirmation and isolation after symptom onset in I patients is denoted by α, and 1/α is the mean period from symptom onset to confirmation. This is the period during which the infection can spread. The constant γ represents the recovery rate of the infected patients in isolation and 1/γ represents the mean period of isolation until recovery.
Equation 1.Differential equation for population changes over time in deterministic SEIHR model for coronavirus disease 2019.
dSdt=-β1NS,dEdt=β1NS-κE,dIdt=κE-αI,dHdt=αI-γH,dRdt=γH,N= S+E+I+H+R
The definitions and values of the parameters in the COVID-19 infection transmission model are shown in Table 1. For the progression rate (κ), isolation rate (α), and recovery rate (γ), the results of data analysis on infection latency period (4 days), mean period since symptom onset to confirmation (4 days), and mean isolation period until recovery (14 days) from the early confirmed cases in Korea were referenced, respectively, according to each definition [4].
For transmission rate (β), it was estimated to minimize the square of the difference in the estimated number of confirmed cases in data (x) and in the model (αI) using the least square fitting method on the daily cumulative confirmed cases data and the cumulative number of confirmed cases on the corresponding date in the model. In other words, the β that minimizes icumulativexi-cumulativeαIi2 was estimated using the “lsqcurvefit” package by Matlab (Table 1).
Reproduction number
The R refers to the average number of secondary infected persons by one primary infected patient during the infectious period. If R is greater than 1, the number of infected patients increases; if R is less than 1, the number of infected patients decreases, and the disease will die out. When R=1, it suggests that the infectious disease has become an endemic and a certain number of patients are continuously present within a community.
R is determined by the probability of the spread of infection upon contact with an infected person, the number of contacts with the infected person, and the duration for which the infected person can spread the infection. Here, β can also be described as the probability of transmission of the infection multiplied by the contact level. The R of COVID-19 calculated from the COVID-19 infection mathematical model in this study is as follows. Here, β is the transmission rate and 1/α is the infection transmission period.
In order to estimate the R at the initial stage of COVID-19 transmission in Hubei, China, the data from daily confirmed cases between December 29, 2019 and February 3, 2020 were used.
In estimating the R at the initial stage of COVID-19 transmission in Korea, the data from the date of symptom onset in 30 confirmed cases between January 20, 2020 and February 17, 2020 were used. In addition, the cases of overseas infection were separated from domestically infected cases to apply the overseas inflow function to the model. For those who were infected while abroad, they were assumed to have entered the I group on the day of symptom onset in the COVID-19 transmission model (Figure 1). If those who were infected while abroad returned to Korea after symptom onset, then they were assumed to have moved to Group I on the date of entry into Korea.
For Daegu and NGP in Korea, it was assumed that 1 infected person with symptoms entered the region on January 22, 2020, the day before Wuhan, China was closed off. Based on the daily confirmed cases in Daegu and NGP between February 18, 2020 and March 4, 2020, R was estimated. As R changed over time, the change in R was reviewed by increasing the data fitting period by 1 day based on the period from February 18, 2020 until February 24, 2020.
COVID-19 early stage epidemic model for Hubei, China
The β for Hubei Province was estimated as 0.806 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.802 to 0.810), and the R was estimated to be 4.028 (95% CI, 4.010 to 4.046).
In addition, as the start date of the epidemic in Hubei is unclear, it could be assumed that there were up to five infected patients (I0) on December 29, 2019, rather than one patient, which changes R from 3.639 (when initial number of patients is 5) to 4.608 (when initial number of patients is 1) (Figure 2).
COVID-19 early stage epidemic model for Korea
When the model was applied to the first 30 cases in Korea, the COVID-19 β was estimated to be 0.139 (95% CI, 0.127 to 0.151) and the R was estimated as 0.555 (95% CI, 0.509 to 0.602) (Table 1 and Figure 3).
COVID-19 model for Daegu and North Gyeongsang Province
Daegu and NGP were showing a pattern of rapid increase since the first case was confirmed on February 18, 2020. Under the assumption that it began with one infected person expressing symptoms on January 22, 2020, the R was estimated with data fitting using the number of daily confirmed cases in Daegu and NGP from February 18, 2020 to March 4, 2020. Depending on the fitting period, the R starts at 3.483 (based on the cases confirmed from February 18, 2020 to 24, 2020), increases to 3.543 (based on the cases confirmed from February 18 to March 1, 2020) and then decreases to 3.476 (based on the cases confirmed from February 18 to March 4, 2020) (Figure 4).
The effects of reduced β and transmission period (period from symptom onset to confirmation, 1/α) due to preventive measures were analyzed. These are the parameters of R calculated above; in order for R to be less than 1, the β must be reduced by at least 72% or the transmission period must be below 28 hours (Appendix 1). Taking these into account, the scenario for the effect of preventive measures assumed a 75%, 90%, and 99% reduction in β, and the transmission period was reduced from 4 days to 2 days. In addition, a comparison was made by assuming that the effect of these preventive measures showed from March 5, 2020 or February 29, 2020. The data were simulated based on the daily confirmed cases from February 18 to 28, 2020, and some of the scenarios were selected and presented in Table 2. The results of simulating the scenario on the effects of preventive measures assumed that an additional large-scale group infection in Daegu and NGP would not occur.
Under the assumption that the effects of preventive measures appear from March 5, 2020, reducing the β by 90% or 99% brought the peak of the epidemic forward to March 7, 2020 and March 6, 2020, with the total number of patients reduced to 26,634 and 19,426, respectively. When the β was reduced by 99% and the transmission period was also reduced to 2 days, the peak of the epidemic occurred a day earlier on March 5, 2020 but the number of daily confirmed cases at the peak of the epidemic increased to 2,425 and the total number of patients slightly decreased to 19,403. However, the point at which daily confirmed cases is equal to or below 10 was brought forward from April 5, 2020 to March 30, 2020, essentially shortening the overall duration of the epidemic.
Assuming that the effects of the preventive measures appear from February 29, 2020, when the transmission period was reduced to 4 days and the β was reduced by 90%, the peak of the epidemic occurred earlier on March 2, 2020 and the total number of patients was also reduced to 8,894. However, the pattern of incidence until March 4, 2020 makes most sense when the transmission period is 2 days and the β is reduced by 75% with the assumption that the effects of preventive measures appear from February 29, 2020. At this point, the peak of the epidemic was February 29, 2020 with the number of daily confirmed cases reaching 819 and the total number of patients estimated to be approximately 10,249. The point in time at which daily confirmed cases drop below 10 cases per day was estimated as April 10, 2020. In other words, the total duration of an epidemic is shortened when the transmission period is reduced from 4 days to 2 days, but this increases the size of the peak of the epidemic. However, there was no significant difference in the total number of patients. It was found that the reduction in β also reduced the total duration of the epidemic and the size of the peak of the epidemic, thereby reducing the total number of patients (Table 2 and Figure 5). The pattern of change in the number of patients according to the date of confirmation for each scenario was presented in the appendix along with the basic scenario (Appendices 2 and 3).
The world is undergoing a COVID-19 epidemic. Although the WHO is delaying official declaration, the signs indicating that a pandemic has already begun are showing up not only in Asia, but also in Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and South America. The R is an important epidemiologic factor in evaluating the level of epidemics and selecting appropriate prevention and intervention policies. However, in the case of COVID-19, various pieces of epidemiological information including R is not known as it is a new infectious disease, and it is necessary for each country to quickly review them as they change according to the progress of the epidemic. In Korea, the number of infected people continuously increases every day since the first case on January 20, 2020. The results of the study indicate that the values of R for COVID-19 are significantly different at the early stage without spreading within the community (from January 19, 2020 to February 10, 2020, based on symptom onset date) and in the case of Daegu and NGP where the number of confirmed cases are rapidly increasing since the diagnosis of patient #31 on February 18, 2020.
The initial R for Korea was about 0.56, which was significantly less than the R=3.6 minus 4.6 calculated for the epidemic in Hubei, China, and also markedly smaller than the estimates that have previously been published (from 2.2 [95% CI, 1.4 to 3.9] to 3.58 [95% CI, 2.89 to 4.39]) [5,6]. Even considering the errors arising from the undetected cases in the initial stage of the epidemic, the initial estimate of R for Korea shows that the infection was effectively controlled as a result of the intervention policy such as the screening by the quarantine authorities, patient isolation, and management of whose who came in contact with the infected.
After February 18, 2020, the R for the Daegu/NGP epidemic was 3.5, which was less than the value during the initial epidemic in Hubei, China (approximately R=4) but was still far greater than the national value in the initial stage. The case of Daegu/NGP shows the spread of COVID-19 under special circumstances. It is postulated that the number of people infected with COVID-19 increased sharply after people attended the massive religious service at Shincheonji Church in Daegu/NGP. In addition, the case of transmission within the Cheongdo Daenam Hospital also shows R that is significantly higher than that of the national estimate due to the continued close contact between patients and medical staff in a confined space. The number is much higher than 2.28 (95% CI, 2.06 to 2.52), which was the R for the initial stage in a study on the Japanese cruise ship (Diamond Princess) [7]. This study shows the R for the transmission between humans without transmission by animals compared to previous studies [5,6] in an environment that perfectly matches the premise for an infectious disease model in which the total population is relatively fixed. For the case of Daegu/NGP, it can be seen that the β was greater than that within the cruise ship due to the close contact that occurred under special circumstances.
The results of predicting R for Daegu/NGP suggested that only using preventive measures such as keeping track of those who came in contact with the infected, as used in the early stage of COVID-19 transmission, was insufficient to prevent the spread in the region. As demonstrated by the results of the simulation, it is possible to reduce the overall size of the epidemic as well as the number of patients during the peak period with a strict prevention policy that reduces COVID-19 transmission, in addition to the initial prevention method. To achieve this, it is necessary to implement the preventive measures that reduce the probability of transmission upon contact with an infected person, the level of contact, and the duration of transmission, all of which affect the R. For example, in order to reduce the probability of transmission upon contact with an infected person, it is necessary to wear a mask when visiting a crowded place or a medical institution, and to engage in social distancing to limit contact with people as much as possible. Also, the current prevention policy of quickly identifying, diagnosing, and isolating infected people is essential to reduce the transmission period. As there is no treatment for COVID-19 with verified effects yet, the transmission period cannot be reduced by using treatment for patients, as in the case for influenza.
The modeling results in this study do not take into account those who are under self-quarantine upon contact with an infected person or the transmission by an asymptomatic patient, and do not show the effects of transmission by and management of asymptomatic infectious people, or the effects of managing those under self-quarantine. As shown by Tang et al. [8], management of asymptomatic infectious people through intensive tracking of those who have been exposed and self-isolation are both effective in reducing the R. The quarantine authorities have upgraded the infectious disease crisis warning to the highest level (‘Serious’) on February 23, 2020, and are implementing special preventive measures in Daegu/NGP. In addition to preparing a dedicated team for managing self-isolators to ensure they remain in isolation, preventive policies such as securing the list of names for Shincheonji Daegu Church attendees to test and isolate them and banning Shincheonji gatherings, which were the source of massive transmission, are being implemented with the expectation to show results soon.
The limitations of this study are as follows: first, the symptom onset dates for patients could not be used in the Daegu/NGP model and only the dates for confirmed diagnosis were used. Therefore, there is a possibility that the predicted schedule for actual patient occurrence may appear earlier than in the results of this study. Second, there may be errors due to fixing the period from symptom onset to diagnosis to 4 days and 2 days in the analysis. This is because the period between symptom onset and diagnosis showed a tendency to become shorter as the epidemic progressed, following the government’s active preventive measures and the increased awareness of symptoms among the infected with a rapid increase in COVID-19 patients. However, due to individual differences, it could not be adjusted uniformly the period from symptom onset to diagnosis. In the future, a model that supplements the data on the symptoms and diagnosis dates for each individual is needed. Third, to simplify mathematical modeling, transmission during latency or asymptomatic infections were not taken into account, and it was assumed that the transmission of infection does not occur when patients are isolated. In addition, this model assumed that there was no inflow of infections from abroad, so it is possible that the number of infected patients is estimated to be smaller than it actually is, and there is a possibility that the epidemic will continue depending on the influx of infected cases from abroad. For the case of Daegu/NGP, assumption was also made that a massive group infection would not occur additionally in the future and the actual pattern of the epidemic may be different from the results of the model if a future largescale group infection occurs. Lastly, the model only includes Daegu/NGP and not the entire population in Korea. This study focused on Daegu/NGP as this region accounts for 90% of the current epidemic, but the pattern of the epidemic might be very different from those of other regions (Appendix 4). Thus, in the future, a detailed regional modelling based on the entire population of Korea should be added.
In conclusion, the early stage epidemic in Korea was controlled at R=0.5 for the initial 30 days with approximately 30 patients but the epidemic in Daegu/NGP starting with patient #31 appeared rapidly in large-scale with R=3.5. However, the transmission period is becoming shorter with active COVID-19 testing by the quarantine authorities, and β is decreasing with active participation of the citizens in preventive measures such as wearing a mask and social distancing. In order to resume normal life by reducing the size of the epidemic and reducing the transmission period to minimize the number of patients, active participation in preventive activities on the part of the citizens is required in addition to continued efforts by the quarantine authorities. In particular, it is necessary to strictly control transmission in group facilities where vulnerable individuals are gathered to prevent local outbreaks. In addition, since the epidemic has spread throughout the world except for China, continued efforts are necessary to prevent the influx of new cases from abroad. Our research team for infectious disease modeling will continue to accumulate new information to modify and develop modeling research results.
Korean version is available at http://www.e-epih.org/.


The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare for this study.


This research was supported by Government-wide R&D Fund project for Infectious Disease research (GFID), Republic of Korea (grant No. HG18C0088).

This research was supported by the Korea National Research Foundation (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MEST) (NRF-2019R1A2B5B01101143).


Conceptualization: SC, MK. Data curation: SC. Formal analysis: SC. Funding acquisition: SC, MK. Methodology: SC, MK. Writing – original draft: SC, MK. Writing – review & editing: SC, MK.

This study was performed under the research project named ‘Research and Development on Integrated Surveillance System for Early Warning of Infectious Diseases (RISEWIDs)’. The investigators of this project were Jaiyong Kim (Yonsei University), Sunworl Kim (National Medical Center), Eui Jung Kwon (National Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service), Dong Wook Kim (National Health Insurance Service), Moran Ki(National Cancer Center), Hyunjin Son (Pusan National University Hospital), Jong-Hun Kim (Sungkyunkwan University), Jin Yong Kim (Incheon Medical Center), Heeyoung Lee (Seoul National University Bundang Hospital), Boyoung Park (Hanyang University), Woo-Sik Son (National Institute for Mathematical Sciences), Jungsoon Choi (Hanyang University), Sunhwa Choi (National Cancer Center), Okyu Kwon (National Institute for Mathematical Sciences), Hyojung Lee (National Institute for Mathematical Sciences), Jong-Hoon Kim (International Vaccine Institute), Heecheon Kim (MISO INFO TECH), and Bo Youl Choi (Hanyang University).
We would like to express deep gratitude to the staff at the KCDC and Public Health Centers, all epidemiologists conducting epidemiological investigations on site, and all the medical staff across the country who are at the forefront of preventing and handling the COVID-19 epidemic. We would also like to thank the citizens who are doing their part in ending the COVID-19 epidemic through social distancing despite the daily inconveniences. We would also like to thank Yu Suk Oh from Design Dano, who created figures that were easy to understand.
Figure 1.
Deterministic SEIHR model for coronavirus disease 2019.
Figure 2.
Estimated reproductive number (R) by daily cumulative reported patients with coronavirus disease 2019 in Hubei Province, China. The number of infected patients (I0) on December 29, 2019 was assumed as 1 to 5. Cumulative number of cases (red dots) and model fitting curves (colored lines).
Figure 3.
Estimated reproductive number (R) by daily cumulative symptom onset patients with coronavirus disease 2019 in Korea from January 20, 2020 to February 17, 2020. Cumulative number of cases (red dots) and model fitting curves (colored lines).
Figure 4.
Estimated reproductive number (R) by daily cumulative confirmed patients in Daegu and North Gyeongsang Province from February 18, 2020 to March 4, 2020. The first patient was assumed to have been infected on January 22, 2020. The fite refers to the last date of the model fitting. Cumulative number of cases (red dots) and model fitting curves (colored lines). (A) fite: February 24, 2020 to February 28, 2020 (B) fite: February 29, 2020 to March 4, 2020
Figure 5.
Estimated number of cumulative confirmed patients by scenario in Daegu and North Gyeongsang Province (see Table 2 for scenarios).
Table 1.
Parameters of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) transmission model in Korea
Symbol Description Value Reference
β Transmission rate 0.1391 Data fitted
κ Progression rate 1/4 [4]
α Isolation rate 1/4 [4]
γ Removal rate for isolated individuals 1/14 [4]

1 The β has been estimated from the early stage COVID-19 epidemic model in Korea from the Results section.

Table 2.
Estimated changes in the peak and size of coronavirus disease 2019 epidemic according to the effect of preventive measures using mathematical modeling in Daegu and North Gyeongsang Province, 2020
Scenario Preventive measures
Peak day Confirmed case at peak day (n) Less than 10 confirmed case per day Less than 1 confirmed case per day Total confirmed case (n)1
Effect start date Transmission duration (d) Transmission rate reduction (%)
Base None 4 0 Apr 5 22,389 Jun 14 Jun 28 4,992,000
1 Mar 5 4 90 Mar 7 1,454 Apr 27 May 20 26,634
2 Mar 5 4 99 Mar 6 1,390 Apr 5 Apr 16 19,426
3 Mar 5 2 99 Mar 5 2,425 Mar 30 Apr 8 19,403
4 Feb 29 4 90 Mar 2 485 Apr 12 May 4 8,894
5 Feb 29 2 75 Feb 29 819 Apr 10 May 1 10,249

1 Cumulative number of confirmed patients to less than one confirmed case per day.

Appendix 1.
A contour map of the reproductive number (R) as transmission rate and transmission duration changes. R=3.5 (red spot) and R=1 (black line).
Appendix 2.
Estimated reproductive number (R) and daily number of confirmed patients in Daegu and North Gyeongsang Province at base scenario which means no preventive measures. R varies with fitting period. Number of cases (red dots) and model fitting curves (colored lines).
Appendix 3.
Estimated daily number of confirmed patients by scenario in Daegu and North Gyeongsang Province. See Table 2 for scenarios. Number of cases (red dots) and model fitting curves (colored lines).
Appendix 4.
Cumulative confirmed number of patients and ratio by region on March 8, 2020. (A) and (B) the national distribution of the cumulative confirmed cases in Korea; (C) the ratio of cumulative confirmed cases by region; Gyeongbuk is North Gyeongsang Province.

Figure & Data



    Citations to this article as recorded by  
    • A probabilistic epidemiological model for infectious diseases: The case of COVID‐19 at global‐level
      Heitor Oliveira Duarte, Paulo Gabriel Siqueira, Alexandre Calumbi Antunes Oliveira, Márcio das Chagas Moura
      Risk Analysis.2023; 43(1): 183.     CrossRef
    • Modified susceptible–exposed–infectious–recovered model for assessing the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic in Seoul
      Seungpil Jung, Jong-Hoon Kim, Seung-Sik Hwang, Junyoung Choi, Woojoo Lee
      Journal of Theoretical Biology.2023; 557: 111329.     CrossRef
    • Cost-effectiveness of a mathematical modeling with optimal control approach of spread of COVID-19 pandemic: A case study in Peru
      Abdelfatah Kouidere, Omar Balatif, Mostafa Rachik
      Chaos, Solitons & Fractals: X.2023; 10: 100090.     CrossRef
    • Mathematical Modeling of COVID-19 Transmission and Intervention in South Korea: A Review of Literature
      Hyojung Lee, Sol Kim, Minyoung Jeong, Eunseo Choi, Hyeonjeong Ahn, Jeehyun Lee
      Yonsei Medical Journal.2023; 64(1): 1.     CrossRef
    • A generalized distributed delay model of COVID-19: An endemic model with immunity waning
      Sarafa A. Iyaniwura, Rabiu Musa, Jude D. Kong
      Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering.2023; 20(3): 5379.     CrossRef
    • Food Insecurity Is Associated with Dietary Consumption during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2019–2020
      Jeong-Hwa Choi
      Nutrients.2023; 15(3): 772.     CrossRef
    • Reproduction Factor Based Latent Epidemic Model Inference: A Data-Driven Approach Using COVID-19 Datasets
      Sujin Ahn, Minhae Kwon
      IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.2023; 27(3): 1259.     CrossRef
    • The COVID-19 pandemic in various restriction policy scenarios based on the dynamic social contact rate
      Hui Hu, Shuaizhou Xiong, Xiaoling Zhang, Shuzhou Liu, Lin Gu, Yuqi Zhu, Dongjin Xiang, Martin Skitmore
      Heliyon.2023; 9(3): e14533.     CrossRef
    • Prediction and Severity Ratings of COVID-19 in the United States
      Liping Yue, Taotao Tu, Xiuyuan Geng
      Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness.2022; 16(1): 262.     CrossRef
    • An interaction Neyman–Scott point process model for coronavirus disease-19
      Jaewoo Park, Won Chang, Boseung Choi
      Spatial Statistics.2022; 47: 100561.     CrossRef
    • Forecasting COVID-19 situation in Bangladesh
      Mossamet Kamrun Nesa, Md. Rashed Babu, Mohammad Tareq Mamun Khan
      Biosafety and Health.2022; 4(1): 6.     CrossRef
    • A Simulation Study on Spread of Disease and Control Measures in Closed Population Using ABM
      Youngmin Kim, Namsuk Cho
      Computation.2022; 10(1): 2.     CrossRef
    • Application of Mathematical Modeling in Prediction of COVID-19 Transmission Dynamics
      Ali AlArjani, Md Taufiq Nasseef, Sanaa M. Kamal, B. V. Subba Rao, Mufti Mahmud, Md Sharif Uddin
      Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering.2022; 47(8): 10163.     CrossRef
    • Stability and Numerical Solutions of Second Wave Mathematical Modeling on COVID-19 and Omicron Outbreak Strategy of Pandemic: Analytical and Error Analysis of Approximate Series Solutions by Using HPM
      Ashwin Muniyappan, Balamuralitharan Sundarappan, Poongodi Manoharan, Mounir Hamdi, Kaamran Raahemifar, Sami Bourouis, Vijayakumar Varadarajan
      Mathematics.2022; 10(3): 343.     CrossRef
    • Mental health during the COVID-19 epidemic: The role of social media
      Salehi Iraj, Solymani Sajjad, Ezati Elahe
      Archives of Community Medicine and Public Health.2022; : 006.     CrossRef
    • Study on the virulence evolution of SARS‐CoV‐2 and the trend of the epidemics of COVID‐19
      Mengyue Wang, Jiabiao Yi, Wen Jiang
      Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences.2022; 45(11): 6515.     CrossRef
    • Effectiveness of face masks in blocking the transmission of SARS-CoV-2: A preliminary evaluation of masks used by SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals
      Vinicius M. Mello, Cristiane M. Eller, Andreza L. Salvio, Felipe F. Nascimento, Camila M. Figueiredo, Emanuelle S. R. F. Silva, Paulo S. F. Sousa, Pamela F. Costa, Anne A. P. Paiva, Maria A. M. M. Mares-Guias, Elba R. S. Lemos, Marco A. P. Horta, Amitava
      PLOS ONE.2022; 17(2): e0264389.     CrossRef
    • Depression before and during-COVID-19 by Gender in the Korean Population
      Won-Tae Cha, Hye-Jin Joo, Yu-Shin Park, Eun-Cheol Park, Soo-Young Kim
      International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2022; 19(6): 3477.     CrossRef
    • Self-care, Household Cleaning and Disinfection During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Study from Metropolitan Cities of India
      Vaishali Chaurasia, Ajay Gupta, Ratna Patel, Shekhar Chauhan, Nitesh Kumar Adichwal, Sachin Kamble
      Annals of Data Science.2022; 9(5): 1085.     CrossRef
    • A Hypothesis-Free Bridging of Disease Dynamics and Non-pharmaceutical Policies
      Xiunan Wang, Hao Wang, Pouria Ramazi, Kyeongah Nah, Mark Lewis
      Bulletin of Mathematical Biology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Infection prevention measures and outcomes for surgical patients during a COVID-19 outbreak in a tertiary hospital in Daegu, South Korea: a retrospective observational study
      Kyung-Hwa Kwak, Jay Kyoung Kim, Ki Tae Kwon, Jinseok Yeo
      Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science.2022; 39(3): 223.     CrossRef
    • Location optimization of emergency medical facilities for public health emergencies in megacities based on genetic algorithm
      Jingkuang Liu, Yuqing Li, Ying Li, Chen Zibo, Xiaotong Lian, Yingyi Zhang
      Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • A Prospective Method for Generating COVID-19 Dynamics
      Kamal Khairudin Sukandar, Andy Leonardo Louismono, Metra Volisa, Rudy Kusdiantara, Muhammad Fakhruddin, Nuning Nuraini, Edy Soewono
      Computation.2022; 10(7): 107.     CrossRef
    • Evaluation of Intervention Policies for the COVID-19 Epidemic in the Seoul/Gyeonggi Region through a Model Simulation
      Jeongjoo Seok, Yunjeong Lee, Jun Yong Choi, Jae-phil Choi, Haesook Seo, Seul Lee, Jeehyun Lee
      Yonsei Medical Journal.2022; 63(8): 707.     CrossRef
    • A rapid assessment of health system preparedness and response to the COVID-19 pandemic in Guinea
      Alexandre Delamou, Abdoulaye Sow, Thierno Oumar Fofana, Sidikiba Sidibé, Karifa Kourouma, Maurice Sandouno, Abdoulaye Touré, Thierno Mamadou Tounkara, Fréderic Le Marcis, Wim Van Damme
      Journal of Public Health in Africa.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Asymptotic solutions of the SIR and SEIR models well above the epidemic threshold
      Gregory Kozyreff
      IMA Journal of Applied Mathematics.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Effectiveness of Household Disinfection Techniques to Remove SARS-CoV-2 from Cloth Masks
      Maria Angélica Monteiro Mello Mares-Guia, Anne Aline Pereira Paiva, Vinicius Motta Mello, Cristiane M. Eller, Andreza Lemos Salvio, Felipe F. Nascimento, Emanuelle S. R. F. Silva, Vinicius Tadeu Martins Guerra Campos, Ygara da Silva Mendes, Elba Regina Sa
      Pathogens.2022; 11(8): 916.     CrossRef
    • Measuring the impact of social-distancing, testing, and undetected asymptomatic cases on the diffusion of COVID-19
      Seungyoo Jeon, Siew Ann Cheong
      PLOS ONE.2022; 17(8): e0273469.     CrossRef
    • Comparison of epidemiological characteristics and transmissibility of different strains of COVID-19 based on the incidence data of all local outbreaks in China as of March 1, 2022
      Yan Niu, Li Luo, Shiting Yang, Guzainuer Abudurusuli, Xiaoye Wang, Zeyu Zhao, Jia Rui, Zhuoyang Li, Bin Deng, Weikang Liu, Zhe Zhang, Kangguo Li, Chan Liu, Peihua Li, Jiefeng Huang, Tianlong Yang, Yao Wang, Tianmu Chen, Qun Li
      Frontiers in Public Health.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Dynamics of COVID-19 Using SEIQR Epidemic Model
      N. Avinash, G. Britto Antony Xavier, Ammar Alsinai, Hanan Ahmed, V. Rexma Sherine, P. Chellamani, Ali Sajid
      Journal of Mathematics.2022; 2022: 1.     CrossRef
    • Social Efficiency of Public Transportation Policy in Response to COVID-19: Model Development and Application to Intercity Buses in Seoul Metropolitan Area
      Junsik Park, Gurjoong Kim
      International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2022; 19(19): 12060.     CrossRef
    • Simulation and forecasting models of COVID-19 taking into account spatio-temporal dynamic characteristics: A review
      Peipei Wang, Xinqi Zheng, Haiyan Liu
      Frontiers in Public Health.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • A model of COVID-19 pandemic with vaccines and mutant viruses
      Young Rock Kim, Yong-Jae Choi, Youngho Min, Martial L Ndeffo Mbah
      PLOS ONE.2022; 17(10): e0275851.     CrossRef
    • Forecasting a New Type of Virus Spread: A Case Study of COVID-19 with Stochastic Parameters
      Victor Zakharov, Yulia Balykina, Igor Ilin, Andrea Tick
      Mathematics.2022; 10(20): 3725.     CrossRef
    • Modeling Complex Systems: A Case Study of Compartmental Models in Epidemiology
      Alexander F. Siegenfeld, Pratyush K. Kollepara, Yaneer Bar-Yam, Toshikazu Kuniya
      Complexity.2022; 2022: 1.     CrossRef
    • Consecutive Rate Model for Covid Infections and Deaths and Prediction of Level-Off Time
      Amila Madiligama, Zachary Vandervort, Arshad Khan
      ACS Omega.2022; 7(51): 48059.     CrossRef
    • Validation of a method to elute viruses from different types of face masks
      Waled Morsy El-Senousy, Faten Hassan Hassan Abdellatif, Hend Mohamed Ahmed, Sherif Abd-Elmaksoud
      Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences.2022; 10(6): 1376.     CrossRef
    • Is the mental health of young students and their family members affected during the quarantine period? Evidence from the COVID‐19 pandemic in Albania
      Enkeleint A. Mechili, Aurela Saliaj, Fatjona Kamberi, Charis Girvalaki, Ela Peto, Athina E. Patelarou, Jorgjia Bucaj, Evridiki Patelarou
      Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing.2021; 28(3): 317.     CrossRef
    • Translating Scientific Knowledge to Government Decision Makers Has Crucial Importance in the Management of the COVID-19 Pandemic
      Katalin Gombos, Róbert Herczeg, Bálint Erőss, Sándor Zsolt Kovács, Annamária Uzzoli, Tamás Nagy, Szabolcs Kiss, Zsolt Szakács, Marcell Imrei, Andrea Szentesi, Anikó Nagy, Attila Fábián, Péter Hegyi, Attila Gyenesei
      Population Health Management.2021; 24(1): 35.     CrossRef
    • Age-Structured Modeling of COVID-19 Epidemic in the USA, UAE and Algeria
      Soufiane Bentout, Abdessamad Tridane, Salih Djilali, Tarik Mohammed Touaoula
      Alexandria Engineering Journal.2021; 60(1): 401.     CrossRef
    • The effect of nationwide quarantine on anxiety levels during the COVID‐19 outbreak in China
      Jing Zhu, Li Su, Yi Zhou, Juan Qiao, Wei Hu
      Brain and Behavior.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Comparison of Two Automated Immunoassays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Antibodies
      Jacqueline A Hubbard, K Aaron Geno, Jenna Khan, Zbigniew M Szczepiorkowski, David de Gijsel, Anais A Ovalle, Ahmad S AlSalman, Torrey L Gallagher, Abigail A Johnston, Amanda R Tibbetts, Sarah E Vital, Mark A Cervinski, Robert D Nerenz
      The Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine.2021; 6(2): 429.     CrossRef
    • Behavioral limitations of individuals for coping with COVID-19: A terror management perspective
      Riaz Ahmed, Adeel Ahmed, Waseem Barkat
      Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment.2021; 31(1-4): 97.     CrossRef
    • Time-varying Reproductive Rates for SARS-CoV-2 and its Implications as a Means of Disease Surveillance on Lockdown Restrictions
      Eman A. Toraih, Mohammad H. Hussein, Rami M. Elshazli, Manal S. Fawzy, August Houghton, Danielle Tatum, Mary Killackey, Emad Kandil, Juan Duchesne
      Annals of Surgery.2021; 273(1): 28.     CrossRef
    • Optimal control approach of a mathematical modeling with multiple delays of the negative impact of delays in applying preventive precautions against the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic with a case study of Brazil and cost-effectiveness
      Abdelfatah Kouidere, Driss Kada, Omar Balatif, Mostafa Rachik, Mouhcine Naim
      Chaos, Solitons & Fractals.2021; 142: 110438.     CrossRef
    • COVID-19 epidemic prediction and the impact of public health interventions: A review of COVID-19 epidemic models
      Yue Xiang, Yonghong Jia, Linlin Chen, Lei Guo, Bizhen Shu, Enshen Long
      Infectious Disease Modelling.2021; 6: 324.     CrossRef
    • The US Public’s Perception of the Threat of COVID-19 During the Rapid Spread of the COVID-19 Outbreak: Cross-Sectional Survey Study
      Xiaolei Xiu, Anran Wang, Qing Qian, Sizhu Wu
      Journal of Medical Internet Research.2021; 23(2): e23400.     CrossRef
    • The value of infectious disease modeling and trend assessment: a public health perspective
      Cheng Ding, Xiaoxiao Liu, Shigui Yang
      Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy.2021; 19(9): 1135.     CrossRef
    • Parameter Estimation of Compartmental Epidemiological Model Using Harmony Search Algorithm and Its Variants
      Kathiresan Gopal, Lai Soon Lee, Hsin-Vonn Seow
      Applied Sciences.2021; 11(3): 1138.     CrossRef
    • Meta-analysis on Serial Intervals and Reproductive Rates for SARS-CoV-2
      Mohammad Hussein, Eman Toraih, Rami Elshazli, Manal Fawzy, August Houghton, Danielle Tatum, Mary Killackey, Emad Kandil, Juan Duchesne
      Annals of Surgery.2021; 273(3): 416.     CrossRef
    • Modeling COVID-19 epidemics in an Excel spreadsheet to enable first-hand accurate predictions of the pandemic evolution in urban areas
      Mario Moisés Alvarez, Everardo González-González, Grissel Trujillo-de Santiago
      Scientific Reports.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Re-estimation of basic reproduction number of COVID-19 based on the epidemic curve by symptom onset date
      K. Hong, S. J. Yum, J. H. Kim, B. C. Chun
      Epidemiology and Infection.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Predicting the dynamical behavior of COVID-19 epidemic and the effect of control strategies
      Mohammad Qaleh Shakhany, Khodakaram Salimifard
      Chaos, Solitons & Fractals.2021; 146: 110823.     CrossRef
    • Impact of mobility restriction in COVID-19 superspreading events using agent-based model
      L. L. Lima, A. P. F. Atman, Lidia Adriana Braunstein
      PLOS ONE.2021; 16(3): e0248708.     CrossRef
    • Pandemic velocity: Forecasting COVID-19 in the US with a machine learning & Bayesian time series compartmental model
      Gregory L. Watson, Di Xiong, Lu Zhang, Joseph A. Zoller, John Shamshoian, Phillip Sundin, Teresa Bufford, Anne W. Rimoin, Marc A. Suchard, Christina M. Ramirez, Virginia E. Pitzer
      PLOS Computational Biology.2021; 17(3): e1008837.     CrossRef
    • Assessing required SARS-CoV-2 blanket testing rates for possible control of the outbreak in the epicentre Lusaka province of Zambia with consideration for asymptomatic individuals: A simple mathematical modelling study
      Joseph Sichone, Musalula Sinkala, Sody Munsaka, Mervis Kikonko, Martin Simuunza, Ji-Zhong Wan
      PLOS ONE.2021; 16(4): e0249479.     CrossRef
    • Assessing Knowledge, Preventive Practices, and Depression among Chinese University Students in Korea and China during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Online Cross-Sectional Study
      Bo Zhao, Fanlei Kong, Eun Woo Nam
      Healthcare.2021; 9(4): 433.     CrossRef
    • A social network analysis of the spread of COVID-19 in South Korea and policy implications
      Wonkwang Jo, Dukjin Chang, Myoungsoon You, Ghi-Hoon Ghim
      Scientific Reports.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • The epidemiological characteristics and effectiveness of countermeasures to contain coronavirus disease 2019 in Ningbo City, Zhejiang Province, China
      Xuying Lao, Li Luo, Zhao Lei, Ting Fang, Yi Chen, Yuhui Liu, Keqin Ding, Dongliang Zhang, Rong Wang, Zeyu Zhao, Jia Rui, Yuanzhao Zhu, Jingwen Xu, Yao Wang, Meng Yang, Bo Yi, Tianmu Chen
      Scientific Reports.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Estimation of novel coronavirus ( COVID ‐19) reproduction number and case fatality rate: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
      Tanvir Ahammed, Aniqua Anjum, Mohammad Meshbahur Rahman, Najmul Haider, Richard Kock, Md Jamal Uddin
      Health Science Reports.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Assessment of basic reproductive number for COVID-19 at global level
      Cheng-Jun Yu, Zi-Xiao Wang, Yue Xu, Ming-Xia Hu, Kai Chen, Gang Qin
      Medicine.2021; 100(18): e25837.     CrossRef
    • A novel fractional mathematical model of COVID-19 epidemic considering quarantine and latent time
      Prashant Pandey, Yu-Ming Chu, J.F. Gómez-Aguilar, Hadi Jahanshahi, Ayman A. Aly
      Results in Physics.2021; 26: 104286.     CrossRef
    • Effectiveness of Testing and Contact-Tracing to Counter COVID-19 Pandemic: Designed Experiments of Agent-Based Simulation
      Young Jin Kim, Pyung-Hoi Koo
      Healthcare.2021; 9(6): 625.     CrossRef
    • Modeling of the COVID-19 pandemic in the limit of no acquired immunity
      J. M. Ilnytskyi
      Mathematical Modeling and Computing.2021; 8(2): 282.     CrossRef
    • Multiple forms of mass anxiety in coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic
      Cecilia Cheng, Hsin-yi Wang, Linus Chan
      Journal of Affective Disorders.2021; 291: 338.     CrossRef
    • Impact of COVID-19 on Food Consumption Pattern and Eating Behavior : Focusing on Adults in the Seoul and Gyeonggi Areas
      Hyeyun Kang, Lana Chung
      Journal of the East Asian Society of Dietary Life.2021; 31(2): 81.     CrossRef
    • Spatially Refined Time-Varying Reproduction Numbers of COVID-19 by Health District in Georgia, USA, March–December 2020
      Chigozie A. Ogwara, Arshpreet Kaur Mallhi, Xinyi Hua, Kamalich Muniz-Rodriguez, Jessica S. Schwind, Xiaolu Zhou, Jeffery A. Jones, Joanne Chopak-Foss, Gerardo Chowell, Isaac Chun-Hai Fung
      Epidemiologia.2021; 2(2): 179.     CrossRef
    • Ct Values Do Not Predict Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Transmissibility in College Students
      Di Tian, Zhen Lin, Ellie M. Kriner, Dalton J. Esneault, Jonathan Tran, Julia C. DeVoto, Naima Okami, Rachel M. Greenberg, Sarah Yanofsky, Swarnamala Ratnayaka, Nicholas Tran, Maeghan Livaccari, Marla L. Lampp, Noel Wang, Scott Tim, Patrick Norton, John Sc
      The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics.2021; 23(9): 1078.     CrossRef
    • Inherently high uncertainty in predicting the time evolution of epidemics
      Seung-Nam Park, Hyong-Ha Kim, Kyoung Beom Lee
      Epidemiology and Health.2021; 43: e2021014.     CrossRef
    • Short- and long-term predictions of novel corona virus using mathematical modeling and artificial intelligence methods
      Hend I. Alkhammash, Sattam Al Otaibi, Nasim Ullah
      International Journal of Modeling, Simulation, and Scientific Computing.2021; 12(03): 2150028.     CrossRef
    • The impact of the undetected COVID-19 cases on its transmission dynamics
      Sujata Saha, Sumanta Saha
      Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics.2021; 52(4): 1229.     CrossRef
    • Association between traffic inflow and COVID-19 prevalence at the provincial level in South Korea
      Hocheol Lee, Eunbi Noh, Huiwon Jeon, Eun Woo Nam
      International Journal of Infectious Diseases.2021; 108: 435.     CrossRef
    • The COVID-19 pandemic and its implications on the environment
      Alessio Facciolà, Pasqualina Laganà, Gabriella Caruso
      Environmental Research.2021; 201: 111648.     CrossRef
    • Systematic review of predictive mathematical models of COVID-19 epidemic
      Subramanian Shankar, Sourya Sourabh Mohakuda, Ankit Kumar, P.S. Nazneen, Arun Kumar Yadav, Kaushik Chatterjee, Kaustuv Chatterjee
      Medical Journal Armed Forces India.2021; 77: S385.     CrossRef
    • Increasing hand-hygiene compliance in clinical settings using a baby-eyes sticker
      Qian Yang, Tian Sang, Zhihua Wu, Run Liang, Fang Wang, Hua Wang, Xinfen Xu, Xinyue Zhou
      Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology.2021; 15: 183449092110398.     CrossRef
    • Statistical Analysis of Outpatients Trends at Korean Medicine Hospitals of Daejeon University by Region before and after COVID-19
      Hyun Ji Cha, Beom Seok Kim, Ki Jung Sung, Young Rok Lee, Hyeon Kyu Choi, Min Ju Kim, Ye Ji Lee, Ju Hyun Jeon, Young Il Kim
      Journal of Korean Medicine.2021; 42(3): 26.     CrossRef
    • Prediction of COVID-19 pervasiveness in six major affected states of India and two-stage variation with temperature
      Sarbjit Singh, Kulwinder Singh Parmar, Jatinder Kaur, Jatinder Kumar, Sidhu Jitendra Singh Makkhan
      Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health.2021; 14(12): 2079.     CrossRef
    • Impact of interventions on the incidence of natural focal diseases during the outbreak of COVID-19 in Jiangsu Province, China
      Xiaoqing Cheng, Jianli Hu, Li Luo, Zeyu Zhao, Nan Zhang, Mikah Ngwanguong Hannah, Jia Rui, Shengnan Lin, Yuanzhao Zhu, Yao Wang, Meng Yang, Jingwen Xu, Xingchun Liu, Tianlong Yang, Weikang Liu, Peihua Li, Bin Deng, Zhuoyang Li, Chan Liu, Jiefeng Huang, Zh
      Parasites & Vectors.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • A Magnetic Modulation Biosensing-Based Molecular Assay for Rapid and Highly Sensitive Clinical Diagnosis of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
      Michael Margulis, Oran Erster, Shira Roth, Michal Mandelboim, Amos Danielli
      The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics.2021; 23(12): 1680.     CrossRef
    • Balance Model of COVID-19 Epidemic Based on Percentage Growth Rate
      Victor Zakharov, Yulia Balykina
      Informatics and Automation.2021; 20(5): 1034.     CrossRef
    • Factors shaping the COVID-19 epidemic curve: a multi-country analysis
      Su Yeon Jang, Laith Hussain-Alkhateeb, Tatiana Rivera Ramirez, Ahmed Asa’ad Al-Aghbari, Dhia Joseph Chackalackal, Rocio Cardenas-Sanchez, Maria Angelica Carrillo, In-Hwan Oh, Eduardo Andrés Alfonso-Sierra, Pia Oechsner, Brian Kibiwott Kirui, Martin Anto,
      BMC Infectious Diseases.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Disease transmission and control modelling at the science–policy interface
      Ruth McCabe, Christl A. Donnelly
      Interface Focus.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Mathematical epidemiologic and simulation modelling of first wave COVID-19 in Malaysia
      Muhammad Rezal Kamel Ariffin, Kathiresan Gopal, Isthrinayagy Krishnarajah, Iszuanie Syafidza Che Ilias, Mohd Bakri Adam, Jayanthi Arasan, Nur Haizum Abd Rahman, Nur Sumirah Mohd Dom, Noraishah Mohammad Sham
      Scientific Reports.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Does the data tell the true story? A modelling assessment of early COVID-19 pandemic suppression and mitigation strategies in Ghana
      Nana Kena Frempong, Theophilus Acheampong, Ofosuhene O. Apenteng, Emmanuel Nakua, John H. Amuasi, Bing Xue
      PLOS ONE.2021; 16(10): e0258164.     CrossRef
    • Rapid transmission of coronavirus disease 2019 within a religious sect in South Korea: A mathematical modeling study
      Jong-Hoon Kim, Hyojung Lee, Yong Sul Won, Woo-Sik Son, Justin Im
      Epidemics.2021; 37: 100519.     CrossRef
    • Spatio-temporal prediction of the COVID-19 pandemic in US counties: modeling with a deep LSTM neural network
      Behnam Nikparvar, Md. Mokhlesur Rahman, Faizeh Hatami, Jean-Claude Thill
      Scientific Reports.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • The detection of the epidemic phase of COVID-19 and the timing of social distancing policies in Korea
      Woohyeon Kim
      Public Health.2021; 201: 89.     CrossRef
    • Activity-based epidemic propagation and contact network scaling in auto-dependent metropolitan areas
      Nishant Kumar, Jimi Oke, Bat-hen Nahmias-Biran
      Scientific Reports.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Novel Coronavirus Pandemic may worsen existing Global Noncommunicable disease crisis
      JS Thakur
      International Journal of Noncommunicable Diseases.2020; 5(1): 1.     CrossRef
    • Potential utilities of mask‐wearing and instant hand hygiene for fighting SARS‐CoV‐2
      Qing‐Xia Ma, Hu Shan, Hong‐Liang Zhang, Gui‐Mei Li, Rui‐Mei Yang, Ji‐Ming Chen
      Journal of Medical Virology.2020; 92(9): 1567.     CrossRef
    • Quarantine alone or in combination with other public health measures to control COVID-19: a rapid review
      Barbara Nussbaumer-Streit, Verena Mayr, Andreea Iulia Dobrescu, Andrea Chapman, Emma Persad, Irma Klerings, Gernot Wagner, Uwe Siebert, Claudia Christof, Casey Zachariah, Gerald Gartlehner
      Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • School Opening Delay Effect on Transmission Dynamics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Korea: Based on Mathematical Modeling and Simulation Study
      Soyoung Kim, Yae-Jean Kim, Kyong Ran Peck, Eunok Jung
      Journal of Korean Medical Science.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • COVID-19; An Update on the Novel Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic
      Subarna Chakravorty
      Sushruta Journal of Health Policy & Opinions.2020; 13(1): 5.     CrossRef
    • World leaders’ usage of Twitter in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: a content analysis
      Sohaib R Rufai, Catey Bunce
      Journal of Public Health.2020; 42(3): 510.     CrossRef
    • The basic reproduction number of SARS‐CoV‐2 in Wuhan is about to die out, how about the rest of the World?
      Bootan Rahman, Evar Sadraddin, Annamaria Porreca
      Reviews in Medical Virology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Improvisation in times of pandemic, a reason for reflection
      Jesús Troya, Luis Miguel Seijo, Mario Pérez, Lucia Sentchordi-Montane, Álvaro Martínez-Alcalá
      International Journal of Infectious Diseases.2020; 96: 361.     CrossRef
    • COVID-19: emerging challenges for oncological surgery
      Guido Torzilli, Jacopo Galvanin, Luca Viganò, Matteo Donadon, Marco Montorsi
      Global Health & Medicine.2020; 2(3): 197.     CrossRef
    • The relationship between trends in COVID-19 prevalence and traffic levels in South Korea
      Hocheol Lee, Sung Jong Park, Ga Ram Lee, Ji Eon Kim, Ji Ho Lee, Yeseul Jung, Eun Woo Nam
      International Journal of Infectious Diseases.2020; 96: 399.     CrossRef
    • Wheat and chaffs in the interpretation of the current COVID19 outbreak in Italy
      Salvatore Chirumbolo, Geir Bjørklund
      VirusDisease.2020; 31(2): 85.     CrossRef
    • Model for a threshold of daily rate reduction of COVID-19 cases to avoid hospital collapse in Chile
      Rodrigo Gutiérrez-Aguilar, Fernando Córdova-Lepe, María Teresa Muñoz-Quezada, Juan Pablo Gutiérrez-Jara
      Medwave.2020; 20(03): e7871.     CrossRef
    • Computed Tomography Features of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
      Nikhil Goyal, Michael Chung, Adam Bernheim, Graham Keir, Xueyan Mei, Mingqian Huang, Shaolin Li, Jeffrey P. Kanne
      Journal of Thoracic Imaging.2020; 35(4): 211.     CrossRef
    • Preliminary Clinical and Epidemiological Analysis of the First 1,000 Pediatric COVID-19 Cases in Moscow Region
      Elena R. Meskina
      Journal of microbiology, epidemiology and immunobiology.2020; 97(3): 202.     CrossRef
    • Why lockdown? Why national unity? Why global solidarity? Simplified arithmetic tools for decision-makers, health professionals, journalists and the general public to explore containment options for the 2019 novel coronavirus
      Gerry F. Killeen, Samson S. Kiware
      Infectious Disease Modelling.2020; 5: 442.     CrossRef
    • COVID-ABS: An agent-based model of COVID-19 epidemic to simulate health and economic effects of social distancing interventions
      Petrônio C.L. Silva, Paulo V.C. Batista, Hélder S. Lima, Marcos A. Alves, Frederico G. Guimarães, Rodrigo C.P. Silva
      Chaos, Solitons & Fractals.2020; 139: 110088.     CrossRef
    • Differences in Sense of Belonging, Pride, and Mental Health in the Daegu Metropolitan Region due to COVID-19: Comparison between the Presence and Absence of National Disaster Relief Fund
      Young-Jae Kim, Jeong-Hyung Cho, E-Sack Kim
      International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2020; 17(13): 4910.     CrossRef
    • Proposal of RT-PCR–Based Mass Population Screening for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (Coronavirus Disease 2019)
      Nikhil S. Sahajpal, Ashis K. Mondal, Allan Njau, Sudha Ananth, Kimya Jones, Pankaj K. Ahluwalia, Meenakshi Ahluwalia, Yasmeen Jilani, Alka Chaubey, Madhuri Hegde, Vamsi Kota, Amyn Rojiani, Ravindra Kolhe
      The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics.2020; 22(10): 1294.     CrossRef
    • Spatio-temporal simulation of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak using the agent-based modeling approach (case study: Urmia, Iran)
      Navid Mahdizadeh Gharakhanlou, Navid Hooshangi
      Informatics in Medicine Unlocked.2020; 20: 100403.     CrossRef
    • A Method by Disposable Medical Hydrogel to Reduce Water Vapor in Goggles
      Hong-lei Wu, Pei-pei Ji, Hai Gu, Jia-hai Shi
      Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.2020; 44(5): 1940.     CrossRef
    • Evaluation of the epidemiological pattern of COVID-19 applying basic reproduction number: An educational review article
      Majid Mirmohammadkhani, Fatemeh Paknazar, Ali Rashidy-pour
      Koomesh journal.2020; 22(3): 373.     CrossRef
    • Lessons from the Mainland of China’s Epidemic Experience in the First Phase about the Growth Rules of Infected and Recovered Cases of COVID-19 Worldwide
      Chuanliang Han, Yimeng Liu, Jiting Tang, Yuyao Zhu, Carlo Jaeger, Saini Yang
      International Journal of Disaster Risk Science.2020; 11(4): 497.     CrossRef
    • Scenarios for the Spread of COVID-19 in Manaus, Northern Brazil
      Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • The Covid-19 outbreak in Spain. A simple dynamics model, some lessons, and a theoretical framework for control response
      Antonio Guirao
      Infectious Disease Modelling.2020; 5: 652.     CrossRef
    • Rapid review of early status of COVID-19 infection in South Korea
      Miyoung Choi, Ho Gyun Shin, Yan Jin, Joo Youn Kim, Kwang Hyub Han
      Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2020; 63(8): 504.     CrossRef
    • The Effect of Strict State Measures on the Epidemiologic Curve of COVID-19 Infection in the Context of a Developing Country: A Simulation from Jordan
      Khalid A. Kheirallah, Belal Alsinglawi, Abdallah Alzoubi, Motasem N. Saidan, Omar Mubin, Mohammed S. Alorjani, Fawaz Mzayek
      International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2020; 17(18): 6530.     CrossRef
    • Dynamic Panel Surveillance of COVID-19 Transmission in the United States to Inform Health Policy: Observational Statistical Study
      James Francis Oehmke, Charles B Moss, Lauren Nadya Singh, Theresa Bristol Oehmke, Lori Ann Post
      Journal of Medical Internet Research.2020; 22(10): e21955.     CrossRef
    • Quarantine alone or in combination with other public health measures to control COVID-19: a rapid review
      Barbara Nussbaumer-Streit, Verena Mayr, Andreea Iulia Dobrescu, Andrea Chapman, Emma Persad, Irma Klerings, Gernot Wagner, Uwe Siebert, Dominic Ledinger, Casey Zachariah, Gerald Gartlehner
      Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • COVID-19 healthcare demand and mortality in Sweden in response to non-pharmaceutical mitigation and suppression scenarios
      Henrik Sjödin, Anders F Johansson, Åke Brännström, Zia Farooq, Hedi Katre Kriit, Annelies Wilder-Smith, Christofer Åström, Johan Thunberg, Mårten Söderquist, Joacim Rocklöv
      International Journal of Epidemiology.2020; 49(5): 1443.     CrossRef
    • Was sollte ein Urologe zu SARS-Cov-2 wissen? Risikoanalyse für urologische Operationen und Handlungsempfehlungen im klinischen Alltag
      Y. Kunz, W. Horninger, G.-M. Pinggera
      Der Urologe.2020; 59(11): 1361.     CrossRef
    • Recommendations for the Management of Patients With Systemic Rheumatic Diseases During the Coronavirus Disease Pandemic
      Mi Ryoung Seo, Ji-Won Kim, Eun-Jung Park, Seung Min Jung, Yoon-Kyoung Sung, Hyungjin Kim, Gunwoo Kim, Hyun-Sook Kim, Myeung-Su Lee, Jisoo Lee, Jian Hur, Bum Sik Chin, Joong Sik Eom, Han Joo Baek
      Journal of Rheumatic Diseases.2020; 27(4): 218.     CrossRef
    • Remodelling elective hospital services in the COVID-19 era – designing the new normal
      Lamin A King, Sandeep S Hothi
      Future Healthcare Journal.2020; 7(3): e60.     CrossRef
    • Mathematical Model of COVID-19 Transmission Dynamics in South Korea: The Impacts of Travel Restrictions, Social Distancing, and Early Detection
      Byul Nim Kim, Eunjung Kim, Sunmi Lee, Chunyoung Oh
      Processes.2020; 8(10): 1304.     CrossRef
    • Modeling the Impact of Unreported Cases of the COVID-19 in the North African Countries
      Salih Djilali, Lahbib Benahmadi, Abdessamad Tridane, Khadija Niri
      Biology.2020; 9(11): 373.     CrossRef
    • Recommendations for the management of patients with systemic rheumatic diseases during the coronavirus disease pandemic
      Mi Ryoung Seo, Ji-Won Kim, Eun-Jung Park, Seung Min Jung, Yoon-Kyoung Sung, Hyungjin Kim, Gunwoo Kim, Hyun-Sook Kim, Myeung-Su Lee, Jisoo Lee, Ji An Hur, Bum Sik Chin, Joong Sik Eom, Han Joo Baek
      The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2020; 35(6): 1317.     CrossRef
    • Reproductive number of coronavirus: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on global level evidence
      Md. Arif Billah, Md. Mamun Miah, Md. Nuruzzaman Khan, Maria Elena Flacco
      PLOS ONE.2020; 15(11): e0242128.     CrossRef
    • Random Network Transmission and Countermeasures in Containing Global Spread of COVID-19-Alike Pandemic: A Hybrid Modelling Approach
      Yimin Zhou, Jun Li, Lingjian Ye, Zuguo Chen, Qingsong Luo, Xiangdong Wu, Haiyang Ni, Dan Selişteanu
      Complexity.2020; 2020: 1.     CrossRef
    • Are urologists in trouble with SARS‐CoV‐2? Reflections and recommendations for specific interventions
      Yannic Kunz, Wolfgang Horninger, Germar‐M Pinggera
      BJU International.2020; 126(6): 670.     CrossRef
    • The effect of national lockdown due to COVID-19 on emergency department visits
      Ilari Kuitunen, Ville T. Ponkilainen, Antti P. Launonen, Aleksi Reito, Teemu P. Hevonkorpi, Juha Paloneva, Ville M. Mattila
      Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Changes in Air Quality during the COVID-19 Pandemic and Associated Health Benefits in Korea
      Ji Hoon Seo, Ji Soo Kim, Jinho Yang, Hyunjun Yun, Minwoo Roh, Jung Woon Kim, Songhun Yu, Na Na Jeong, Hyun Woo Jeon, Joung Sook Choi, Jong Ryeul Sohn
      Applied Sciences.2020; 10(23): 8720.     CrossRef
    • Understanding South Korea’s Response to the COVID-19 Outbreak: A Real-Time Analysis
      Eunsun Jeong, Munire Hagose, Hyungul Jung, Moran Ki, Antoine Flahault
      International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2020; 17(24): 9571.     CrossRef
    • A compendium of evidence related to ‘social distancing’measure in view of the spread of COVID-19 pandemic
      Anuradha Shah, Kunal Shah
      Healthline.2020; 11(2): 120.     CrossRef


    Epidemiol Health : Epidemiology and Health