INTRODUCTION
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was first reported as viral pneumonia in Wuhan, China in December 2019. It then became a pandemic in which > 100 million people were infected by the end of January 2021 [1]. The International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses Coronaviridae Study Group named the causative virus severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) [2]. With the rapid spread of COVID-19 in high-risk groups from mid-February to early March 2020, the number of confirmed cases in Korea ranked second in the world after China. By the end of January 2021, > 70,000 COVID-19 cases had been confirmed in Korea [3].
It is noteworthy that the COVID-19 outbreak in Korea started mainly from a religious group’s activities in Daegu, a metropolitan city. The 31st confirmed case (case #31) in Korea lived in Daegu and was diagnosed on February 18, 2020 [4]. An epidemiological investigation identified that case #31 was a member of the S religious group, who attended worship services on February 9, 2020 and February 16, 2020 while symptomatic. An investigation was conducted among S religious group members who attended these services (n=1,001). The number of confirmed cases increased, exceeding 2,000 at the end of February 2020 and 5,000 by early March 2020. Most of the confirmed cases were related to the S religious group. As of March 31, 2020, 63.7% (4,257 of 6,684) of all confirmed cases were members of the S religious group [4].
The epidemiological and clinical characteristics of confirmed COVID-19 cases admitted to a tertiary hospital in Daegu (n=694) [5] and the actions of the Daegu municipal health authorities to combat this COVID-19 outbreak [6] have been described. This study analyzed the characteristics of confirmed COVID-19 cases among S religious group members and non-members based on epidemiological surveys. In addition, this study aimed to summarize the processes and responses to the Daegu COVID-19 outbreak, which was caused mainly by religious activities.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Source of data
Information on the confirmed cases was obtained through (1) a basic epidemiological survey performed by 8 public healthcare centers in Daegu, and (2) an in-depth epidemiological survey conducted by the Daegu Center for Infectious Diseases Control and Prevention. Primarily, data from the in-depth epidemiological survey were referenced. When individual data were missing from the in-depth epidemiological survey, data recorded in the basic epidemiological survey were used to supplement the missing information where available.
Case definition
COVID-19 cases were identified according to the Coronavirus Infectious Disease-19 Response Guidelines of the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (KCDC) (sixth edition, as of February 20, 2020) [7]. COVID-19 confirmation was determined by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assays. Laboratory protocols for the accurate diagnosis of COVID-19 were provided by the Korean Society of Diagnostic Laboratory Medicine and KCDC (second edition, as of February 21, 2020) [8]. The COVID-19 confirmation date for each case was based on the information retrieved from the epidemiological investigation, which was not identical to the confirmation date officially announced by Daegu municipal authorities.
Study subjects
The study subjects were confirmed COVID-19-positive individuals from February 18, 2020 to June 30, 2020 who participated in the in-depth epidemiological survey in Daegu. There were 7,008 final study subjects. In this study, a member of the S religious group was defined as (1) a case recorded as an S religious group member in the basic epidemiological survey and/or in-depth epidemiological survey, or (2) a case recorded to have attended the worship service of the S religious group in the basic epidemiological survey and/or in-depth epidemiological survey. All other cases were classified as non-members. According to this definition, there were 4,309 members of the S religious group and 2,699 non-members.
Statistical analysis
The number of confirmed cases per day according to the symptom onset and confirmation date was shown as an epidemic curve. All analysis results were presented by stratifying the cases into S religious group members and non-members. The characteristics of confirmed cases were summarized as frequencies (n) and proportions (%) for categorical variables and means and standard deviations for continuous variables. The case-fatality rate (%) was defined as the number of deaths divided by the number of confirmed cases× 100. The statistical significance of differences in categorical variables between groups was tested using the chisquare test or Fisher exact test. Statistical differences in continuous variables between groups were tested using the independent t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). A p-value of < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.
RESULTS
The COVID-19 outbreak in Daegu: processes and responses
Table 1 summarizes the processes and responses to the COVID-19 outbreak in Daegu centered on the S religious group after February 18, 2020. The index case of the Daegu COVID-19 outbreak (case #31 in Korea) reported February 7, 2020 as the symptom onset date. A total of 61 cases reported that symptoms appeared before February 7, 2020. Since many confirmed cases were asymptomatic (38.7% in the current study, as discussed below), it was impossible to identify the primary source of infection.
The index case (case #31) attended the worship services of the S religious group on February 9, 2020 and February 16, 2020. Since these dates were within the period of communicability [9], the Daegu church and 24 church-related facilities (including 2 churches, 11 centers, and 11 gospel rooms) of the S religious group immediately closed on February 18, 2020. The Daegu municipal government secured a list of all attendees at the S religious group’s worship services on February 9 and February 16 (n=1,001) and conducted a telephone survey on February 19. It was found that 14.9% of respondents (90/605, corresponding to 9.0% of all attendees) reported symptoms. These 90 symptomatic members were asked to self-isolate and to receive screening tests.
The cumulative number of confirmed cases increased to 108 by February 20, of whom 90 (83.3%) were identified as S religious group members. The Daegu municipal government and health experts determined that COVID-19 had started spreading to the community. All S religious group members were asked to wear face masks indoors and outdoors, as well as to quarantine away from their families. On February 20, a telephone survey was conducted among all members of the S religious group, and self-quarantine was recommended. On February 21, the Daegu government started performing COVID-19 screening tests on 1,261 symptomatic individuals. On February 23, a self-quarantine officer was designated to monitor all members of the S religious group. On February 25, the Daegu government started performing COVID-19 screening tests on asymptomatic individuals from the S religious group and sent a self-quarantine message to all members. Daegu established a 1:3 management system between 3,000 civil servants and 9,336 members of the S religious group, and members’ self-quarantine status was checked twice daily.
On March 2, therapeutic living centers were launched to support patients with mild clinical symptoms and no concurrent medical conditions [10]. All members of the S religious group were advised to undergo COVID-19 screening tests. An administrative order was issued against members who did not undergo screening tests before March 7. As of March 9, 97.6% (10,220/10,471) of the S religious group members had undergone screening tests, and 42.9% (4,137/9,651) of members who were notified of the test results were confirmed as COVID-19 cases [4].
Distribution of the number of cases per day
The number of confirmed COVID-19 cases in Daegu increased sharply after mid-February and peaked in early March (Figure 1). The curve of the daily number of confirmed cases showed the spread of the epidemic from the S religious group to the general population in the local community. Unlike the general epidemic curve, the S religious group’s epidemic curve was based on active and preemptive screening tests. The number of confirmed cases after early March declined as screening tests were no longer required for the S religious group. However, confirmed cases among non-members continued to increase. Of 7,008 cases, 4,687 (66.9%) reported a symptom onset date during the epidemiological investigation, and 2,321 cases (33.1%) were asymptomatic or had an unclear symptom onset date.
Characteristics of confirmed COVID-19 cases in Daegu
S religious group members accounted for 61.5% (4,309/7,008) of all confirmed cases in Daegu from February 18, 2020 to June 30, 2020 (Table 2). The worship services attendance rates among confirmed members of the S religious group were 72.8% (3,135/4,309) on February 9, 67.8% (2,921/4,309) on February 12, and 77.4% (3,333/4,309) on February 16. Among all confirmed cases, 5.1% (n=354) lived with a member of the S religious group and 1.5% (n=104) were in contact with a member. Other cases included 19.3% (n=1,355) who had contact with a confirmed case, 0.9% (n=61) who came from overseas, and 11.8% (n=825) with an unknown source of infection at the time of the epidemiological investigation.
Table 3 shows the confirmed cases’ general characteristics according to their membership in the S religious group. The proportion of female among members (66.3%) was higher than among non-members (54.2%, p<0.001). The mean ages of members and non-members were 38.7 years and 53.7 years, respectively (p<0.001). The most represented age groups were 20-29 years (38.3%) among members and 50-59 years (20.9%) among non-members. The comorbid disease prevalence was generally higher in non-members than in members. Hypertension and diabetes mellitus ranked as the first and second most common comorbid diseases in both groups, respectively. The prevalence of hypertension was 4.2% in members and 9.6% in non-members (p<0.001). The prevalence of diabetes mellitus was 2.3% in members and 6.1% in non-members (p<0.001).
Symptoms of confirmed COVID-19 cases
At the time of the epidemiological investigation, 23.7% of nonmembers and 38.7% of members of the S religious group reported no symptoms (p<0.001) (Table 4). The asymptomatic proportions were higher for members than non-members in the same age groups (Supplementary Material 1). The main symptoms observed in non-members included fever (35.5%), cough (33.7%), myalgia (21.2%), sputum (19.1%), and sore throat (18.9%). Similarly, members experienced main symptoms of cough (25.8%), fever (16.0%), sputum (15.4%), myalgia (14.6%), and sore throat (13.6%). In both groups, less common symptoms included chills, dyspnea, headache, general weakness, rhinorrhea, diarrhea, chest pain or discomfort, a decreased sense of smell and/or taste, dizziness, vomiting, and nausea.
Case-fatality rate of confirmed COVID-19 cases
The COVID-19 case-fatality rates were 6.4% in non-members and 0.3% in S religious group members (Table 5). In general, the case-fatality rates increased with age. When compared within the age ranges of 60-69 years, 70-79 years, and ≥ 80 years, the case-fatality rates of non-members were significantly higher than those of members within the same age group. The case-fatality rates among cases > 80 years old were 31.2% in non-members and 7.7% in members (p=0.012). Compared with the case-fatality rate of all confirmed cases in Korea until early February 2021 [11], the case-fatality rate of non-members was higher, and that of members was lower.
Examples of non-cooperation with countermeasures of quarantine authorities
According to the regular briefings by the Daegu municipal government on the COVID-19 response [4], there were several examples of individual members or executives of the S religious group interfering with the city’s countermeasures. First, the executives of the S religious group submitted a membership list that omitted some members. Second, some cases were concealed or misrepresented in matters related to the religion during the epidemiological investigations, confusing the quarantine authorities’ responses (14th regular briefing report of Daegu, February 28, 2020). Third, there were cases of refusal of screening tests, violation of self-isolation guidelines, and refusal to transfer to a hospital or therapeutic living center (16th report briefing report of Daegu, March 1, 2020). The reasons for refusing to enter the therapeutic living center included wanting to stay with their children and families or a request for hospital admission (25th report briefing report of Daegu, March 10, 2020).
Compared to non-members, the intervals from symptom onset to diagnosis (p<0.001) and from diagnosis to admission (p<0.001) of members were longer, whereas the interval from admission to discharge (p<0.001) was shorter during the same period (Supplementary Material 2).
DISCUSSION
The COVID-19 outbreak in Daegu started with identifying case #31 in Korea on February 18, 2020. This case was a member of the S religious group, and she had attended worship services with hundreds of members. By conducting preemptive screening tests for all S religious group members within a short period, the number of COVID-19 cases increased sharply. The COVID-19 outbreak triggered by religious activities resulted in rapid transmission of the virus to high-risk groups in the community. Compared with non-members, the members of the S religious group had a higher proportion of female, a younger average age, and a lower prevalence of underlying diseases.
The proportion of asymptomatic COVID-19 infections is estimated to be 18% to 81% [12]. Recent studies reported that symptomatic COVID-19 infections were positively correlated with older age, working outside the home, respiratory comorbidities, and alcohol use [13,14]. The proportion of asymptomatic cases in our study at the time of the epidemiological investigation was higher among members than non-members. Symptom onset of cases may have occurred after the epidemiological investigation, although we were unable to follow-up whether they developed symptoms after self-isolation or hospital admission. Therefore, the asymptomatic proportion of either group may have been overestimated. In another study of 10 asymptomatic COVID-19 cases at diagnosis, 6 cases reported symptoms during a follow-up and in-depth interview [15].
When compared within the same age groups, the proportions of asymptomatic cases among S religious group members were lower than those among non-members (Supplementary Material 1). Early extensive screening tests performed on > 10,000 members may have contributed to the high proportion of asymptomatic or mild infections. Considering the example of providing inaccurate information to the Daegu municipal government, the possibility of under-reporting symptoms cannot be excluded. Because the proportion of asymptomatic cases may be high in the early stages of COVID-19 infection, public health measures to block silent infections in the early period of an outbreak in the community are essential.
In our study, the case-fatality rate was higher in non-members than in members of the S religious group. This finding can be attributed to the older age distribution of non-members compared with members. However, a comparison within the same age groups showed that the case-fatality rates of non-members were higher than those of members. This may have been because many non-members had underlying diseases and were hospitalized in long-term care or psychiatric hospitals [16]. The low case fatality observed among members may suggest a kind of “healthy worker effect,” considering that the case-fatality rates of the S religious group members were lower than those of all cases in Korea in the same age groups. People with serious illnesses are less likely to engage in external religious activities [17]. Those who have better overall health are likely to participate in energetic religious activities. Positive effects of religious activity on health have also been reported [18,19].
The S religious group is derived from the Christian new religious movement in Korea. The unusual religious practices of the S religious group seem to have provided ideal conditions for COVID-19 to rapidly spread among members. Since the activities of the S religious group are often conducted in secret and there is little information regarding them available to the public, it is challenging to present qualitative and quantitative data on their religious activities. Close contact between members in a confined space during religious events (e.g., worship service) may result in wide spread of infectious diseases. It is known that hundreds of members sit side by side in rows on the floor to worship in groups. A high-density work environment can also be a high-risk factor for the transmission of infectious diseases. COVID-19 outbreaks in crowded office settings, such as call centers, have been reported [20]. In religious groups, singing or speaking out loud during hymns and vocal prayers in church services can contribute to the rapid spread of COVID-19. Starting on July 10, 2020, the Korean government mandated churches to comply with core quarantine rules. These included keeping at least a 1 m distance between churchgoers (ideally 2 m), prohibiting hymns and vocal prayers during church services, and prohibiting the consumption of food in the facility [21].
Members of the S religious group are also known to lead special group lives. Some live in certain areas or within a single household. During the COVID-19 outbreak, it was discovered that many confirmed cases occurred in the H apartment buildings in Daegu [4]. All 46 confirmed cases in the apartment buildings were members of the S religious group. This outbreak in the apartment buildings served as a motivation to identify the group residence behavior of the religious group. An additional investigation on the residential facilities of religious groups by the Daegu municipal government identified 64 residential complexes in which ≥ 10 members resided (26th regular briefing report of Daegu, March 11, 2020). Due to concern regarding contact with the fully recovered members of the S religious group, all confirmed members who were in self-isolation at home were forcibly admitted to a hospital or therapeutic living center.
The current study has some limitations. First, since the epidemiological investigation was not prepared for research, some variables were absent or insufficient (e.g., clinical severity). Second, because the epidemiological investigation was conducted during the rapid increase in the number of confirmed cases, some information may have been collected incorrectly; however, no further investigation could be done. For example, a confirmed case reported January 1, 2020 as the symptom onset date (for reference, the Daegu COVID-19 outbreak was detected on February 18, 2020). It would be necessary to confirm whether the questionnaire was filled out correctly or if the respondent understood and answered the question accurately, but it was impossible to do so. Caution should be taken when interpreting these results because the values of the epidemiological investigation variables (including asymptomatic proportion) may change according to a further in-depth investigation. In addition, some cases’ responses were difficult to classify into symptoms or diseases using appropriate medical terminology because some cases responded in plain language or used incorrect medical terms. A standardized epidemiological investigation form and guidelines are needed to collect systematic and efficient information. To conduct statistical analyses using epidemiological investigation data surveyed on paper, it took a long time to code and clean the data. If a system that can use computer-based or web-based questionnaires is built, the time required to analyze epidemiological data will be reduced. Third, S religious group members who were confirmed after the end of June or that lived outside Daegu were not included in the study. However, this study can be regarded as providing representative data for the S religious group, since our study included > 80% of confirmed cases who were S religious group members. The total number of confirmed COVID-19 cases in the S religious group was 5,214 (4,512 in Daegu and 702 in other regions), accounting for 6.4% of all confirmed cases (n=81,487) in Korea as of February 9, 2021 [11].
In this study, major epidemiological indicators, such as the exposure date, incubation period, and COVID-19 generation time, were not evaluated. In the S religious group, there was a large-scale epidemic within a short period of time. Most of the members attended worship services several times, often participated in religious activities other than worship, and frequently lived in the same household. Thus, we judged that estimations of individual exposure dates would be inaccurate. For the same reason, it was impossible to distinguish between the nth generation of infection among confirmed cases. In addition, from the early days of the outbreak, epidemiological investigations focused on identifying the daily movements (visited places) of confirmed cases. In the in-depth epidemiological survey, the visited places of confirmed cases were recorded in detail. However, information on individuals they were in contact with and the associated contact dates was not recorded systematically in many cases. Combining additional data and analyses in the future will allow major epidemiological indicators to be evaluated. In addition, useful information on COVID-19 can be obtained in the future if the confirmed case data can be linked with global positioning system or drug utilization review data.
The main strength of this study is that it examined the COVID-19 outbreak triggered by the special circumstances of religious activities in the local community. Moreover, it summarized the initial characteristics in a large sample size of confirmed cases in the early stages of the COVID-19 outbreak according to S religious group membership and the Daegu municipal government’s response to the outbreak. Compared with a study that reported the characteristics of cases who received treatment after admission to the hospital [5], the characteristics such as the distribution of age, prevalence of comorbid diseases, and proportion of asymptomatic infections were different.
In conclusion, the Daegu COVID-19 outbreak in February 2020 was mainly caused by a religious group’s activities. It was impossible to identify the first case of infection due to the high proportion of asymptomatic cases. The confirmed cases who were members of the S religious group showed different epidemiological characteristics from the non-member cases. Countermeasures to separate S religious group members from other residents, including isolation and screening tests for all members, prevented the further massive spread of COVID-19 in the community.
PDF Links
Summary
PubReader
ePub Link
XML Download
Full text via DOI
Download Citation
CrossRef TDM
Download PPT
Print
