epiH :: Epidemiology and Health

CrossRef Text and Data Mining

Result of CrossRef Text and Data Mining Search is the related articles with entitled article. If you click link1 or link2 you will be able to reach the full text site of selected articles; however, some links do not show the full text immediately at now. If you click CrossRef Text and Data Mining Download icon, you will be able to get whole list of articles from literature included in CrossRef Text and Data Mining.

A suggestion for quality assessment in systematic reviews of observational studies in nutritional epidemiology

Jong-Myon Bae

Epidemiol Health. 2016;38:e2016014 Published online April 26, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2016014

Quality assessment of observational studies is not commonplace in systematic reviews

Christian Mallen, George Peat, Peter Croft

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2006;59(8):765-769

Link1 Link2

Quality Assessment of Observational Studies for Systematic Reviews

N. Kiss, V. Tongbram, K.J. Fortier

Value in Health. 2013;16(7):A614

Link1 Link2

Development of a quality assessment tool for systematic reviews of observational studies (QATSO) of HIV prevalence in men having sex with men and associated risk behaviours

William CW Wong, Catherine SK Cheung, Graham J Hart

Emerging Themes in Epidemiology. 2008;5(1):

Link1

Link2 Link3

Systematic reviews synthesized evidence without consistent quality assessment of primary studies examining epidemiology of chronic diseases

Tatyana Shamliyan, Robert L. Kane, Stacy Jansen

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2012;65(6):610-618

Link1 Link2

Quality assessment practice in systematic reviews of mediation studies: results from an overview of systematic reviews

Tat-Thang Vo, Aidan Cashin, Cecilia Superchi, Pham Hien Trang Tu, Thanh Binh Nguyen, Isabelle Boutron, David MacKinnon, Tyler Vanderweele, Hopin Lee, Stijn Vansteelandt

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2022;143:137-148

Link1 Link2

Reporting quality of statistical methods in surgical observational studies: protocol for systematic review

Robert Wu, Peter Glen, Tim Ramsay, Guillaume Martel

Systematic Reviews. 2014;3(1):

Link1

Link2 Link3 Link4

The value of including observational studies in systematic reviews was unclear: a descriptive study

Jennifer Seida, Donna M. Dryden, Lisa Hartling

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2014;67(12):1343-1352

Link1 Link2

Poor Quality of Reporting Confounding Bias in Observational Intervention Studies: A Systematic Review

Rolf H.H. Groenwold, Anna M.M. Van Deursen, Arno W. Hoes, Eelko Hak

Annals of Epidemiology. 2008;18(10):746-751

Link1 Link2

Use of quality assessment tools in systematic reviews was varied and inconsistent

Jadbinder Seehra, Nikolaos Pandis, Despina Koletsi, Padhraig S. Fleming

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2016;69:179-184.e5

Link1 Link2

Quality assessment of prevalence studies: a systematic review

Celina Borges Migliavaca, Cinara Stein, Verônica Colpani, Zachary Munn, Maicon Falavigna

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2020;127:59-68

Link1 Link2