Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Epidemiol Health : Epidemiology and Health

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
5 "Health policy"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Methods
Plan and operations of the 10th Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2025–2027)
Sun-Ja Kim, Sihyun Park, Sunja Kim, Suyeon Park, Yoonjung Kim, Yunjung Choi, Sungha Yun, Kyungwon Oh
Epidemiol Health. 2026;48:e2026001.   Published online January 2, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2026001
  • 801 View
  • 45 Download
AbstractAbstract AbstractSummary PDFSupplementary Material
Abstract
The Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) is a national health survey mandated by Article 16 of the National Health Promotion Act to assess the health and nutritional status of the Korean population. Over the past 2 decades, the survey has continuously introduced timely survey components while strengthening its survey methodology and operational systems to enhance both the policy relevance and scientific utility of its findings. The 10th KNHANES (2025–2027) preserves the statistical representativeness of its sampling design while expanding the use of web-based self-administered questionnaires to improve participant convenience. In response to Korea’s transition into a super-aged society, the 10th KNHANES incorporates enhanced older-adult health surveys, including osteoporosis assessment and older adults’ life functioning, and newly introduces items addressing social support as part of the social determinants of health. In addition, a longitudinal follow-up survey system has been established to monitor long-term changes in population health. Collectively, these changes are expected to improve understanding of aging-related health issues, support evidence-based national health policy development, and expand the applicability of KNHANES data for academic research.
Summary
Korean summary
국민건강영양조사는 국민건강증진법 제16조에 근거하여 1998년부터 우리 국민의 건강 및 영양 수준을 파악해 온 국가 단위 건강조사이다. 제10기(2025–2027) 국민건강영양조사는 통계적 대표성을 유지하면서 온라인 조사로의 지속적인 개선·확대, 초고령 사회 등 사회·보건환경 변화에 대응한 신규 조사항목 도입, 추적조사 체계 구축을 통해 국가 건강정책 및 만성질환 예방·관리 전략 수립을 위한 근거 생산을 강화하고자 한다.
Key Message
The Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) is a national health survey mandated by Article 16 of the National Health Promotion Act that has assessed the health and nutritional status of the Korean population since 1998. The 10th KNHANES (2025–2027) maintains statistical representativeness while further improving and expanding web-based self-administered surveys, incorporating new survey components in response to social and public health changes such as the transition to a super-aged society, and establishing a longitudinal follow-up system to strengthen the evidence base for national health policy development and chronic disease prevention and management.
Systematic Review
Effectiveness of community-based interventions for older adults living alone: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Inhye Kim, Hyunseo An, Sohyeon Yun, Hae Yean Park
Epidemiol Health. 2024;46:e2024013.   Published online January 3, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2024013
  • 27,818 View
  • 394 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
AbstractAbstract AbstractSummary PDFSupplementary Material
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
This study examined the effectiveness of community-based interventions designed for older adults living alone through a systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS
The study incorporated 4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 5 non-RCTs to evaluate various interventions. The methodological quality of these studies was assessed using the Downs and Black checklist, while Q-statistic and I-square tests were performed to examine statistical heterogeneity. Additionally, visual inspection of funnel plots and the trim-and-fill method were employed to investigate potential publication bias. Of the 2,729 identified studies, 9 met the criteria for inclusion in this review. Independent variables were categorized into 5 groups (physical activity, nutrition, social relationships, social participation, and combined intervention) to examine their effects. Dependent variables were similarly classified into 5 subgroups to identify the specific effects of the interventions.
RESULTS
Interventions focusing on nutrition and combined approaches were the most effective, yielding effect sizes of 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 1.25) and 0.43 (95% CI, 0.26 to 0.60), respectively. The interventions had the greatest impacts on the health behavior and mental health of the participants, with effect sizes of 0.98 (95% CI, 0.73 to 1.22) for health behavior and 0.67 (95% CI, 0.19 to 1.16) for mental health.
CONCLUSIONS
This study suggests a direction for the development of community-based interventions tailored to the needs of older adults living alone. Additionally, it provides evidence to inform policy decisions concerning this demographic.
Summary
Korean summary
본 연구는 독거 노인들 대상으로 한 지역사회 기반 중재의 효과에 대하여 탐색하고 그 효과 크기를 확인하기 위하여 체계적고찰 및 메타분석을 실시하였다. 영양 및 복합 중재가 특히 효과적이었으며, 이는 건강 행동과 정신건강에 있어 중요한 긍정적 효과를 나타내어 추후 개별적 맞춤 중재의 잠재적 효과성을 나타낸다. 이러한 발견은 독거노인 집단의 웰빙 향상을 위한 프로그램과 정책 입안에 근거로 활용될 수 있다.
Key Message
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the impact of community-based interventions for older adults living alone, incorporating 9 studies to assess effectiveness in areas like nutrition and combined strategies. Results indicated significant benefits, particularly in health behavior and mental health, demonstrating the potential of tailored interventions. These findings support the development of targeted programs and policy decisions aimed at improving the well-being of this demographic.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Mental health promotion strategies for minority older adults in highland areas during disease outbreaks: a qualitative exploration
    Supaporn Sudnongbua, Samran Chuamuangphan
    BMC Geriatrics.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Falls among older adults: An exploration of trends, clinical outcomes, predisposing risk factors, and intervention strategies
    Sanjan Kumar, Francis Cruz, Zackary Yates, Quratulain Amin, Muhammad Usman Awan, Philip Lee, Sarthak Kumar, Adel Elkbuli
    The American Journal of Surgery.2025; 245: 116385.     CrossRef
  • A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY ON TRIGLYCERIDE AND BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVELS IN THE ELDERLY POPULATION
    Ika Ainur Rofiah, Lasiyati Yuswo Yani
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING AND MIDWIFERY SCIENCE (IJNMS).2025; 9(1): 102.     CrossRef
  • Prevalence and associated factors of physical-psychological-cognitive multimorbidity in Chinese community-dwelling older adults: a cross-sectional study
    Lin Lin, Di-fei Duan, Linjia Yan, Hai yan He
    PeerJ.2025; 13: e19750.     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness of a resilience-building nursing intervention on psychological well-being in Arab community-dwelling older adults
    Walaa Badawy Mohamed Badawy, Amal Hashem Mohamed, Mostafa Shaban
    Geriatric Nursing.2024; 60: 338.     CrossRef
Original Article
Deprived areas and community water fluoridation in Brazil: a multilevel approach for refocusing public policy
Franklin Barbosa da Silva, José Leopoldo Ferreira Antunes, Paulo Frazão
Epidemiol Health. 2021;43:e2021031.   Published online May 1, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2021031
  • 17,914 View
  • 329 Download
AbstractAbstract AbstractSummary PDF
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
The aim of this study was to determine whether geographic location, socioeconomic status, infant mortality, and mortality from diarrheal disease in health regions are associated with the provision of community water fluoridation (CWF) in Brazilian municipalities.
METHODS
A multilevel ecological study was conducted based on data from the National Survey of Basic Sanitation and Human Development Atlas. A multilevel analysis was carried out considering Brazilian municipalities as the first level and health regions as the second level, comprising sanitation, demographic, socioeconomic, and health characteristics.
RESULTS
The observation units comprised 5,565 municipalities clustered in 438 health regions in Brazil. The lack of CWF provision was positively associated with the following municipal characteristics: a below-median proportion of inhabitants covered by the sewage network, medium to very low human development index, below-median per capita gross domestic product, and an above-median percentage of expenditures on sanitation. In relation to the health regions, the likelihood of a lack of CWF provision was greater in the municipalities belonging to the health regions located in the Northern and Northeastern areas of Brazil and in those where child mortality due to acute diarrheal disease and the proportion of people with low income were higher when adjusted by municipal indicators.
CONCLUSIONS
Information on the characteristics associated with CWF provision constitutes important input for refocusing public policy to reduce inequalities among Brazilian municipalities and health regions. These findings may help policy-makers to understand the challenges facing CWF expansion in low-, middle-, and high-income countries.
Summary
Key Message
Just as the challenges for CWF's expansion in Brazil's most vulnerable areas require firm leadership for refocusing public policy, expansion in low- and middle-income countries demands a continued global collaborative effort.
Lecture
Shared decision making: relevant concepts and facilitating strategies
Jong-Myon Bae
Epidemiol Health. 2017;39:e2017048.   Published online October 30, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2017048
  • 34,837 View
  • 511 Download
  • 54 Web of Science
  • 58 Crossref
AbstractAbstract AbstractSummary PDFSupplementary Material
Abstract
As the paradigm in healthcare nowadays is the evidence-based, patient-centered decision making, the issue of shared decision making (SDM) is highlighted. The aims of this manuscript were to look at the relevant concepts and suggest the facilitating strategies for overcoming barriers of conducting SDM. While the definitions of SDM were discordant, several concepts such as good communication, individual autonomy, patient participants, and patient-centered decision-making were involved. Further, the facilitating strategies of SDM were to educate and train physician, to apply clinical practice guidelines and patient decision aids, to develop valid measurement tools for evaluation of SDM processes, and to investigate the impact of SDM.
Summary
Korean summary
오늘날 보건의료가 지향하는 목표가 근거에 기반한 환자중심의 의사결정 (Evidence-based Patient-centered Decision Making)인 점에서, 공유된 의사결정 (Shared Decision Making, SDM)의 중요성이 강조되고 있다. 본 원고는 SDM의 관련 개념들을 정리하고, 진료에 적용하는 과정에서의 한계점들과 이를 극복하기 위한 방안들을 살펴보았다.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Shared decision making for people living with multimorbidity: A concept analysis
    Shupeng Shi, Xingzhou Liu, Yongjie Li, Chuan Yang
    Patient Education and Counseling.2025; 135: 108712.     CrossRef
  • Insights of shared decision-making and personalized treatment in orthopedics – A qualitative systematic review
    Dheeraj Makkar, Ravi Sauhta, Surekha Jaganmohan, T. Priyadarshini, Viji Devanand, Ashwini Raja
    Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma.2025; 65: 102989.     CrossRef
  • To Take or Not to Take Antiseizure Medications
    Wesley T. Kerr, Katherine N. McFarlane
    Neurology Clinical Practice.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evidence on Patient Decision Aids and Shared Decision-Making Across Breast Centers in Europe: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study
    Vittoria Ardito, Natalia Oprea, Oriana Ciani
    Cancer Control.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Beyond the Words: How Physicians’ Verbal and Nonverbal Communication Shape Patients’ Intentions to Seek Health Information
    Danni Liao, Jia Yan, Sam R. Wilson
    Health Communication.2025; : 1.     CrossRef
  • Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria: Review of the patient experience and treatment landscape
    Anem Waheed, Jamile Shammo, David Dingli
    Blood Reviews.2024; 64: 101158.     CrossRef
  • The Effects of Patient Preference on Clinical Outcome, Satisfaction and Adherence Within the Treatment of Anxiety and Depression: A Meta‐Analysis
    Eline Eigenhuis, Vanessa E. M. van Buuren, Rosa E. Boeschoten, Anna D. T. Muntingh, Neeltje M. Batelaan, Patricia van Oppen
    Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Cardiovascular Complications During Delivery Admissions Associated With Assisted Reproductive Technology (from a National Inpatient Sample Analysis 2008 to 2019)
    Salman Zahid, Anas Hashem, Anum S. Minhas, Colleen M. Harrington, Odayme Quesada, Niti R. Aggarwal, Chrisandra L. Shufelt, Valerie L. Baker, Erin D. Michos
    The American Journal of Cardiology.2023; 186: 126.     CrossRef
  • Assessing the impact of patient-involvement healthcare strategies on patients, providers, and the healthcare system: A systematic review
    Thomas Miller, Markus Reihlen
    Patient Education and Counseling.2023; 110: 107652.     CrossRef
  • Patients’ and healthcare professionals’ perceived facilitators and barriers for shared decision-making for frail and elderly patients in perioperative care: a scoping review
    Amyn Vogel, Camille Guinemer, Daniel Fürstenau
    BMC Health Services Research.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Addressing Antimicrobial Stewardship in Primary Care—Developing Patient Information Sheets Using Co-Design Methodology
    Ruby Biezen, Stephen Ciavarella, Jo-Anne Manski-Nankervis, Tim Monaghan, Kirsty Buising
    Antibiotics.2023; 12(3): 458.     CrossRef
  • Preferred Conversation Topics with Respect to Treatment Decisions Among Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes
    Anna Tichler, Dorijn FL Hertroijs, Dirk Ruwaard, Martijn CGJ Brouwers, Mickaël Hiligsmann, Judith D de Jong, Arianne Elissen
    Patient Preference and Adherence.2023; Volume 17: 719.     CrossRef
  • Electronic patient portal activation and outcomes among pediatric patients with asthma
    Dariush Kafashzadeh, Kaitlin Hall, Cenan Pirani, Peter G. Szilagyi, Lucia Chen, Mindy K. Ross
    The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice.2023; 11(6): 1950.     CrossRef
  • Differences in minimal disease knowledge of keratoconus patients: results from an international survey
    Philipp B Baenninger, Vito Romano, Francisco C Figueiredo, Sayali P Pradhan, Vishal Vohra, Bennie H Jeng, Katja C Iselin, Conor C Murphy, Claude Kaufmann, Michael A Thiel, Lucas M Bachmann
    BMJ Open Ophthalmology.2023; 8(1): e001164.     CrossRef
  • Shared decision making among hypertensive clients in public hospitals of West Shoa, central Ethiopia, 2020: Institution based cross sectional study
    Desalegn Emana, Mulu Kitaba, Firaol Regea, Shalama Lekasa
    Heliyon.2023; 9(6): e16786.     CrossRef
  • Development and preliminary usability testing of an electronic conversation guide incorporating patient values and prognostic information in preparation for older people's decision-making near the end of life
    Magnolia Cardona, Ebony T. Lewis, Alex Bannach-Brown, Genevieve Ip, Janice Tan, Eyza Koreshe, Joshua Head, Jin Jie Lee, Shirley Rangel, Lorraine Bublitz, Connor Forbes, Amanda Murray, Isabella Marechal-Ross, Nikita Bathla, Ruth Kusnadi, Peter G. Brown, Ha
    Internet Interventions.2023; 33: 100643.     CrossRef
  • Investigating Medical Students’ Navigation of Ethical Dilemmas: Understanding the Breakdown and How to Solve It
    Adam J. Wesevich, Lauren E. Gulbas, Hilary F. Ryder
    AJOB Empirical Bioethics.2023; 14(4): 227.     CrossRef
  • Shared Decision-Making in Allergen Immunotherapy (AIT) Options Using a Questionnaire for Respiratory Allergic Patients: A Delphi Consensus Study
    Mónica Antón, Nieves Cabañes, Salvador Fernández-Meléndez, Mar Fernández-Nieto, Gloria Jiménez-Ferrera, Antonio Letrán, Paula Méndez-Brea, Javier Montoro, Francisco Moreno, Pilar Mur-Gimeno, Virginia Rodríguez-Vázquez, Ana Rosado, Inmaculada Sánchez-Guerr
    Patient Preference and Adherence.2023; Volume 17: 1771.     CrossRef
  • Factors influencing shared decision-making in long-term care facilities
    Da Eun Kim, Min Jung Kim
    BMC Geriatrics.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A Useful and Sustainable Role for N‐of‐1 Trials in the Healthcare Ecosystem
    Harry P. Selker, Theodora Cohen, Ralph B. D’Agostino, Willard H. Dere, S. Nassir Ghaemi, Peter K. Honig, Kenneth I. Kaitin, Heather C. Kaplan, Richard L. Kravitz, Kay Larholt, Newell E. McElwee, Kenneth A. Oye, Marisha E. Palm, Eleanor Perfetto, Chandra R
    Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics.2022; 112(2): 224.     CrossRef
  • Shared Decision-Making for a Dialysis Modality
    Xueqing Yu, Masaaki Nakayama, Mai-Szu Wu, Yong-Lim Kim, Lily Mushahar, Cheuk Chun Szeto, Dori Schatell, Fredric O. Finkelstein, Robert R. Quinn, Michelle Duddington
    Kidney International Reports.2022; 7(1): 15.     CrossRef
  • Oral health problems linked to obstructive sleep apnea are not always recognized within dental care—As described by dental professionals
    Kristina Berggren, Anders Broström, Allen Firestone, Bridget Wright, Eva Josefsson, Ulrika Lindmark
    Clinical and Experimental Dental Research.2022; 8(1): 84.     CrossRef
  • Health professionals’ perspectives on shared decision-making in secondary mental healthcare: a qualitative study
    Chiu-Yi Lin, Laoise Renwick, Karina Lovell
    Journal of Mental Health.2022; 31(5): 709.     CrossRef
  • Applying Theory of Planned Behavior to Understand Physicians’ Shared Decision-Making With Patients With Acute Respiratory Infections in Primary Care: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Dan Wang, Xinping Zhang, Haihong Chen, Chenxi Liu
    Frontiers in Pharmacology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Shared decision making in primary care: Process evaluation of the intervention in the OPTIMAL study, a cluster randomised trial
    Henk Den Ouden, Rimke C. Vos, Arwen H. Pieterse, Guy E.H.M. Rutten
    Primary Care Diabetes.2022; 16(3): 375.     CrossRef
  • Social Determinants and Self-Care for Making Good Treatment Decisions and Treatment Participation in Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study
    Udoka Okpalauwaekwe, Chih-Ying Li, Huey-Ming Tzeng
    Nursing Reports.2022; 12(1): 198.     CrossRef
  • Global Guidelines in Dermatology Mapping Project (GUIDEMAP), a systematic review of atopic dermatitis clinical practice guidelines: are they clear, unbiased, trustworthy and evidence based (CUTE)?*
    Bernd W.M. Arents, Esther J. van Zuuren, Sofieke Vermeulen, Jan W. Schoones, Zbys Fedorowicz
    British Journal of Dermatology.2022; 186(5): 792.     CrossRef
  • Moving shared decision-making forward in Iran
    Samira Abbasgholizadeh-Rahimi, Nam Nguyen, Mahasti Alizadeh, Dan Poenaru
    Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen.2022; 171: 62.     CrossRef
  • Health facility practices and patterns of prescription influencing health-seeking behaviour among caregivers of children diagnosed with pneumonia in Endebess Sub-county, Kenya
    Everlyne N. Opuba, Patrick O. Onyango
    Journal of Global Health Reports.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Adverse Effects of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors in Humans: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 378 Randomized Controlled Trials
    Mingkwan Na Takuathung, Wannachai Sakuludomkan, Rapheephorn Khatsri, Nahathai Dukaew, Napatsorn Kraivisitkul, Balqis Ahmadmusa, Chollada Mahakkanukrauh, Kachathip Wangthaweesap, Jirakit Onin, Salin Srichai, Nida Buawangpong, Nut Koonrungsesomboon
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2022; 19(14): 8373.     CrossRef
  • How does patient engagement work in a real-world setting? Recommendations, caveats, and challenges from a psychosocial perspective
    Guendalina Graffigna, Serena Barello
    Patient Education and Counseling.2022; 105(12): 3567.     CrossRef
  • A qualitative emancipatory inquiry into relationships between people with mental disorders and health professionals
    Concepción Martínez‐Martínez, Vanessa Sánchez‐Martínez, Javier Ballester‐Martínez, Miguel Richart‐Martínez, Juan Diego Ramos‐Pichardo
    Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing.2021; 28(4): 721.     CrossRef
  • Even High-Quality CPGs Seldom Include Implementation Strategies
    Luciana Pereira de Vasconcelos, Daniela Oliveira De Melo, Airton Tetelbom Stein, Heráclito Barbosa de Carvalho
    Frontiers in Pharmacology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Association between Health Literacy, Patient Activation, and Functional Capacity in Individuals with Rheumatoid Arthritis
    Isabela V. Oliveira, Mariana M. G. do Nascimento, Adriana M. Kakehasi, Carina de Morais Neves, Hagabo M. Silva, Thuane S. Gonçalves, Raquel de Moura Aredes, Djenane R. de Oliveira
    The Open Rheumatology Journal.2021; 15(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Do Patients With Keratoconus Have Minimal Disease Knowledge?
    Philipp B. Baenninger, Lucas M. Bachmann, Markus Ritzmann, Frank Blaser, Zisis Gatzioufas, Marco Alder, Armin Handzic, Katja Iselin, Claude Kaufmann, Michael A. Thiel
    Cornea.2021; 40(5): 624.     CrossRef
  • The Impact of Dementia on Cancer Treatment Decision-Making, Cancer Treatment, and Mortality: A Mixed Studies Review
    Yaelin Caba, Kavita Dharmarajan, Christina Gillezeau, Katherine A Ornstein, Madhu Mazumdar, Naomi Alpert, Rebecca M Schwartz, Emanuela Taioli, Bian Liu
    JNCI Cancer Spectrum.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Mismatch of corneal specialists’ expectations and keratoconus knowledge in general ophthalmologists - a prospective observational study in Switzerland
    Philipp B. Baenninger, Lucas M. Bachmann, Katja C. Iselin, Oliver A. Pfaeffli, Claude Kaufmann, Michael A. Thiel, Gerd Gigerenzer
    BMC Medical Education.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Envirome Web Service: Patient context at the point of care
    N.J. Kane, X. Wang, M.M. Gerkovich, M. Breitkreutz, B. Rivera, H. Kunchithapatham, M.A. Hoffman
    Journal of Biomedical Informatics.2021; 119: 103817.     CrossRef
  • Beyond-Mild Psoriasis: A Consensus Statement on Calcipotriol and Betamethasone Dipropionate Foam for the Topical Treatment of Adult Patients
    Roland Aschoff, Anthony Bewley, Annunziata Dattola, Clara De Simone, Mourad Lahfa, Mar Llamas-Velasco, Antonio Martorell, Mira Pavlovic, Michael Sticherling
    Dermatology and Therapy.2021; 11(5): 1791.     CrossRef
  • The social construction of the patient-physician relationship in the clinical encounter: Media frames on shared decision making in Germany
    Amyn Vogel, Felix Balzer, Daniel Fürstenau
    Social Science & Medicine.2021; 289: 114420.     CrossRef
  • Awareness of Doctors’ Shared Decision-Making in Life-Sustaining Care Decisions
    Dalyong Kim, Hyun Jung Lee, Soo-Young Yu, Jung Hye Kwon, Hee Kyung Ahn, Jee Hyun Kim, Seyoung Seo, Chi Hoon Maeng, Seungtaek Lim, Do Yeun Kim, Sung Joon Shin
    The Korean Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care.2021; 24(4): 204.     CrossRef
  • Treatment Adherence among Tuberculosis patients: A Concept Analysis
    Kristina Lisum, Agung Waluyo, Astuti Yuni Nursasi
    Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences.2021; 9(T5): 20.     CrossRef
  • Assessment of medical students’ shared decision-making skills in simulated physician-patient encounters
    Alexander Waschwill, Anja Bittner, Sigrid Harendza
    Patient Education and Counseling.2020; 103(3): 500.     CrossRef
  • Overview of the main challenges in shared decision making in a multicultural and diverse society in the intensive and critical care setting
    Enrico Giuliani, Gabriele Melegari, Francesca Carrieri, Alberto Barbieri
    Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice.2020; 26(2): 520.     CrossRef
  • Improving shared decision-making in advance care planning: Implementation of a cluster randomized staff intervention in dementia care
    Bart Goossens, Aline Sevenants, Anja Declercq, Chantal Van Audenhove
    Patient Education and Counseling.2020; 103(4): 839.     CrossRef
  • Implementing a shared decision‐making and cognitive strategy‐based intervention: Knowledge user perspectives and recommendations
    Kay‐Ann M. Allen, Katherine R. Dittmann, Jennifer A. Hutter, Catherine Chuang, Michelle L. Donald, Amie L. Enns, Nina Hovanec, Anne W. Hunt, Richard S. Kellowan, Elizabeth A. Linkewich, Alexandra S. Patel, Anisha Rehmtulla, Sara E. McEwen
    Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice.2020; 26(2): 575.     CrossRef
  • Physiotherapists deliver management broadly consistent with recommended practice in rotator cuff tendinopathy: An observational study
    A. Smythe, J. White, C. Littlewood, J. Bury, T. Haines, P. Malliaras
    Musculoskeletal Science and Practice.2020; 47: 102132.     CrossRef
  • Enhanced Youden's index with net benefit: A feasible approach for optimal‐threshold determination in shared decision making
    Senlin Lin, Yingyan Ma, Haidong Zou
    Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice.2020; 26(2): 551.     CrossRef
  • Cultural adaptation of a patient decision-aid for insulin therapy
    Ngiap Chuan Tan, Agnes Koong Ying Leng, Ian Phoon Kwong Yun, Sinead Wang Zhen, Muthulakshmi Paulpandi, Yew Kong Lee, John Furler, Josip Car, Chirk Jenn Ng
    BMJ Open.2020; 10(3): e033791.     CrossRef
  • The provision of epidural analgesia during labor according to maternal birthplace: a Norwegian register study
    Åsa Henning Waldum, Anne Flem Jacobsen, Mirjam Lukasse, Anne Cathrine Staff, Ragnhild Sørum Falk, Siri Vangen, Ingvil Krarup Sørbye
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • What Oncologists Should Know About Treating Sexual and Gender Minority Patients With Cancer
    Gwendolyn P. Quinn, Ash B. Alpert, Megan Sutter, Matthew B. Schabath
    JCO Oncology Practice.2020; 16(6): 309.     CrossRef
  • Exercise Is Medicine? The Cardiorespiratory Implications of Ultra-marathon
    Nicholas B. Tiller, Glenn M. Stewart, Camilla R. Illidi, Benjamin D. Levine
    Current Sports Medicine Reports.2020; 19(8): 290.     CrossRef
  • The OPTION Scale: Measuring Patients’ Perceptions of Shared Decision-Making in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia


    Sumaiah Alrawiai, Afnan Aljaffary, Saja Al-Rayes, Arwa Alumran, Mishael Alhuseini, Bayan Hariri
    Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare.2020; Volume 13: 1337.     CrossRef
  • Therapeutic Patient Education in the practice of physicians at the Geneva University Hospitals: a qualitative analysis of representative situations and skills
    Jorge César Correia, Aline Lasserre Moutet, Isabelle Fristalon, Grégoire Lagger, Alain Golay, Olivia Braillard
    Education Thérapeutique du Patient - Therapeutic Patient Education.2020; 12(2): 20202.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Pearls for Managing Hidradenitis Suppurativa Patients of Low Socioeconomic Status
    Shanice A. McKenzie, Hadar A. Lev-Tov, Vivian Y. Shi, Jennifer L. Hsiao
    Dermatology.2020; 236(5): 439.     CrossRef
  • Patients’ and Caregivers’ Conceptualisations of Pressure Ulcers and the Process of Decision-Making in the Context of Home Care
    Francisco José García-Sánchez, Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno, Beatriz Rodríguez-Martín
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2019; 16(15): 2719.     CrossRef
  • Opportunities for addressing gaps in primary care shared decision-making with technology: a mixed-methods needs assessment
    Anjali J Misra, Shawn Y Ong, Arjun Gokhale, Sameer Khan, Edward R Melnick
    JAMIA Open.2019; 2(4): 447.     CrossRef
  • Ethical, pedagogical, socio-political and anthropological implications of quaternary prevention
    Marc Jamoulle, Michel Roland, Jong-Myon Bae, Bruno Heleno, Giorgio Visentin, Gustavo Diniz Ferreira Gusso, Maciek Godycki-Ćwirko, Miguel Pizzanell, Patrick Ouvrard, Ricardo La Valle, Luis Filipe Gomes, Daniel Widmer, Jorge Bernstein, Mariana Mariño, Hamil
    Revista Brasileira de Medicina de Família e Comunidade.2018; 13(40): 1.     CrossRef
Perspective
Suggestions for the promotion of evidence-based public health in South Korea
Jong-Myon Bae
Epidemiol Health. 2017;39:e2017030.   Published online July 19, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2017030
  • 24,783 View
  • 220 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
AbstractAbstract AbstractSummary PDFSupplementary Material
Abstract
Evidence-based public health (EBPH) is defined as public health decision-making based on current best evidence. Debates about the latent tuberculosis infection control program suggested by the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 2017 highlight the need to promote EBPH. Three strategies have been proposed, including providing necessary evidence by evaluating policy-evidence gaps; delivering high-quality, relevant, and timely evidence by conducting systematic reviews and adapting public health guidelines; and making value-driven decisions by training and educating public health policymakers.
Summary
Korean summary
근거중심 공중보건 (EBPH)는 공중보건영역에서 최신과 최선의 근거에 기반하여 의사결정을 하는 것이다. EBPH를 활성화하기 위해서는 정책-근거 간의 간극을 알아내고, 체계적 고찰을 통한 공중보건지침을 개발하며, 의사결정참여자의 역량을 높이기 위한 교육훈련을 추진하는 것이다.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Enhancing postoperative recovery with multimodal prehabilitation: the journey begins before surgery
    Ah-Reum Cho, Wariya Vongchaiudomchoke, Detlef Balde, Do Jun Kim, Francesco Carli
    Korean Journal of Anesthesiology.2025; 78(5): 401.     CrossRef
  • Ecuador’s 2025 presidential election and the disconnection between public health and the political agendas
    Esteban Ortiz-Prado, Enrique Terán, Karla Alejandra Cuenca, Julia Saa Echeverria, Martín Gallardo, María Paz Cadena, Mateo Barriga, Jorge Vasconez-Gonzalez, Juan S. Izquierdo-Condoy
    Frontiers in Public Health.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparative efficacy on outcomes of C-CABG, OPCAB, and ONBEAT in coronary heart disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Lin Zhu, Dongjie Li, Xu Zhang, Sitong Wan, Yuyong Liu, HongJia Zhang, Junjie Luo, Yongting Luo, Peng An, Wenjian Jiang
    International Journal of Surgery.2023; 109(12): 4263.     CrossRef
  • Ethical, pedagogical, socio-political and anthropological implications of quaternary prevention
    Marc Jamoulle, Michel Roland, Jong-Myon Bae, Bruno Heleno, Giorgio Visentin, Gustavo Diniz Ferreira Gusso, Maciek Godycki-Ćwirko, Miguel Pizzanell, Patrick Ouvrard, Ricardo La Valle, Luis Filipe Gomes, Daniel Widmer, Jorge Bernstein, Mariana Mariño, Hamil
    Revista Brasileira de Medicina de Família e Comunidade.2018; 13(40): 1.     CrossRef
  • Network meta-analysis: application and practice using Stata
    Sungryul Shim, Byung-Ho Yoon, In-Soo Shin, Jong-Myon Bae
    Epidemiology and Health.2017; 39: e2017047.     CrossRef

Epidemiol Health : Epidemiology and Health
TOP