KSE
Search
- Page Path
- HOME > Search
COVID-19: Correspondence
- Authors’ Reply: Vaccination, payment, and COVID-19
- Jelena Dotlic, Vida Jeremic Stojkovic, Paul Cummins, Marija Milic, Tatjana Gazibara
- Epidemiol Health. 2021;43:e2021100. Published online November 23, 2021
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2021100
- 8,451 View
- 118 Download
-
PDF -
Abstract
-
SummaryCOVID-19: Perspective
- Enhancing COVID-19 vaccination coverage using financial incentives: arguments to help health providers counterbalance erroneous claims
- Jelena Dotlic, Vida Jeremic Stojkovic, Paul Cummins, Marija Milic, Tatjana Gazibara
- Epidemiol Health. 2021;43:e2021081. Published online October 6, 2021
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2021081
- 10,092 View
- 137 Download
- 7 Web of Science
- 7 Crossref
-
Abstract
Summary
PDF -
AbstractFinancial reimbursements after receiving the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine have been criticized in the literature. This strategy has been described as payment to receive the vaccines, undue inducement, and unethical. We are aware that healthcare workers who work in primary healthcare, prevention, and public health may encounter similar reasons from people who refuse vaccination against COVID-19. For this reason, we are compelled to clarify these claims and provide arguments for all healthcare workers who might be challenged by such reasoning. In this critical review, we discuss why the claims against financial incentives that have been presented in the literature are erroneous.
-
SummaryKey Message
When assessing the ethics of financial incentives to receive the COVID-19 vaccine, we must not confuse matters by invoking ethical concepts that are not relevant to this public health issue; calling a financial incentive an "undue inducement" is a mistake because it assumes that it would distort a potential recipient’s judgment to take on unacceptable risk, when these vaccines have already been tested and authorized by regulatory agencies, which suggests the risk is not substantial, but quite the opposite - they benefit the recipients.Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Exploring the Views of Barbers and Stylists on the Acceptability of Delivering Community-Based Interventions to Promote COVID-19 Testing and Vaccination in South Carolina
Paddington T. Mundagowa, Sachi Vora, Fatima Seck, Neal Dhankhode, Kwame S. Sakyi, Mufaro Kanyangarara
Vaccines.2024; 12(9): 1011. CrossRef - Role of new vaccinators/pharmacists in life-course vaccination
T. Mark Doherty, Lois Privor-Dumm
Annals of Medicine.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - The effectiveness of financial incentives for COVID-19 vaccination: A systematic review
Gabriela K. Khazanov, Rebecca Stewart, Matteo F. Pieri, Candice Huang, Christopher T. Robertson, K. Aleks Schaefer, Hansoo Ko, Jessica Fishman
Preventive Medicine.2023; 172: 107538. CrossRef - Mandatory and seasonal vaccination against COVID-19: Attitudes of the vaccinated people in Serbia
Verica Jovanovic, Marija Milic, Jelena Dotlic, Smiljana Cvjetkovic, Vida Jeremic Stojkovic, Natasa Maksimovic, Maja Sekulic, Tatjana Gazibara
Epidemiology and Infection.2023;[Epub] CrossRef - Letter to the Editor: Financial incentives for COVID-19 vaccination
Hyuncheol Bryant Kim
Epidemiology and Health.2021; 43: e2021088. CrossRef - Letter to the Editor: Enhancing COVID-19 vaccination coverage using financial incentives: arguments to help health providers counterbalance erroneous claims
Yong-jun Choi
Epidemiology and Health.2021; 43: e2021087. CrossRef - Authors’ Reply: Vaccination, payment, and COVID-19
Jelena Dotlic, Vida Jeremic Stojkovic, Paul Cummins, Marija Milic, Tatjana Gazibara
Epidemiology and Health.2021; 43: e2021100. CrossRef
First
Prev
